Literature DB >> 20646402

Technology as a force for improved diagnosis and treatment of breast disease.

Claire M B Holloway1, Alexandra Easson, Jaime Escallon, Wey Liang Leong, May Lynn Quan, Michael Reedjik, Frances C Wright, David R McCready.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of women are seeking evaluation of screen-detected breast abnormalities, and more women with breast cancer are living with the consequences of treatment. Improved technologies have helped to individualize diagnostic evaluation and treatment, improve efficacy and minimize morbidity. This article highlights some of these technologies. Superior imaging techniques have improved breast cancer screening and show promise for intraoperative surgical guidance and postoperative specimen evaluation. Digital mammography improves the sensitivity of mammography for women younger than 50 years with dense breasts, and tomosynthesis may improve specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging provides sensitive delineation of the extent of the disease and superior screening for women with a greater than 25% lifetime risk of breast cancer Minimally invasive techniques have been developed for the assessment of intraductal lesions, biopsy of imaging abnormalities, staging of the axilla and breast radiotherapy. Ductoscopy facilitates intraductal biopsy and localization of lesions for excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy is becoming standard for axillary staging, and intraoperative radiotherapy has the potential to reduce treatment time and morbidity. Three-dimensional imaging allows correlation of final histology with preoperative imaging for superior margin assessment. Related techniques show promise for translation to the intraoperative setting for surgical guidance. New classifications of breast cancers based on gene expression, rather than morphology, describe subtypes with different prognoses and treatment implications, and new targeted therapies are emerging. Genetic fingerprints that predict treatment response and outcomes are being developed to assign targeted treatments to individual patients likely to benefit. Surgeons play a vital role in the successful integration of new technologies into practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20646402      PMCID: PMC2912014     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  78 in total

1.  Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: what have we learned?

Authors:  J M Kurtz; J M Spitalier
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  The prognostic significance of late local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  J M Kurtz; J M Spitalier; R Amalric; H Brandone; Y Ayme; J Jacquemier; D Hans; C Bressac
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.

Authors:  D L Morton; D R Wen; J H Wong; J S Economou; L A Cagle; F K Storm; L J Foshag; A J Cochran
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-04

4.  Early breast cancer: predictors of breast recurrence for patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy.

Authors:  J Boyages; A Recht; J L Connolly; S J Schnitt; R Gelman; H Kooy; S Love; R T Osteen; B Cady; B Silver
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.

Authors:  M S Anscher; P Jones; L R Prosnitz; W Blackstock; M Hebert; R Reddick; A Tucker; R Dodge; G Leight; J D Iglehart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Breast-conserving treatment for stage I and II cancer. Tumour excision, axillary dissection, peri-operative interstitial irradiation, with or without peri-operative chemotherapy, followed by breast irradiation--the Tygerberg Hospital experience.

Authors:  J A Van Zyl; A G Muller
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1989-06-03

7.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; D M Kirgan; J M Guenther; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Radiotherapy after breast-preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast.

Authors:  U Veronesi; A Luini; M Del Vecchio; M Greco; V Galimberti; M Merson; F Rilke; V Sacchini; R Saccozzi; T Savio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Breast tumor recurrence following lumpectomy with and without breast irradiation: an overview of recent NSABP findings.

Authors:  B Fisher; D L Wickerham; M Deutsch; S Anderson; C Redmond; E R Fisher
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

10.  Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and survival following lumpectomy and irradiation: pathological findings from NSABP protocol B-06.

Authors:  E R Fisher; S Anderson; C Redmond; B Fisher
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1992 May-Jun
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The inextricable axis of targeted diagnostic imaging and therapy: An immunological natural history approach.

Authors:  Frederick O Cope; Bonnie Abbruzzese; James Sanders; Wendy Metz; Kristyn Sturms; David Ralph; Michael Blue; Jane Zhang; Paige Bracci; Wiam Bshara; Spencer Behr; Toby Maurer; Kenneth Williams; Joshua Walker; Allison Beverly; Brooke Blay; Anirudh Damughatla; Mark Larsen; Courtney Mountain; Erin Neylon; Kaeli Parcel; Kapil Raghuraman; Kevin Ricks; Lucas Rose; Akhilesh Sivakumar; Nicholas Streck; Bryan Wang; Christopher Wasco; Larry S Schlesinger; Abul Azad; Murugesan V S Rajaram; Wael Jarjour; Nicholas Young; Thomas Rosol; Amifred Williams; Michael McGrath
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Copy number imbalances between screen- and symptom-detected breast cancers and impact on disease-free survival.

Authors:  A M Brewster; P Thompson; A A Sahin; K Do; M Edgerton; J L Murray; S Tsavachidis; R Zhou; Y Liu; L Zhang; G Mills; M Bondy
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-07-27

3.  Patients' understanding of treatment goals and disease course and their relationship with optimism, hope, and quality of life: a preliminary study among advanced breast cancer outpatients before receiving palliative treatment.

Authors:  Cem Soylu; Taner Babacan; Ali R Sever; Kadri Altundag
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  The role of health policy in the burden of breast cancer in Brazil.

Authors:  Francisco Winter Dos Santos Figueiredo; Tábata Cristina do Carmo Almeida; Débora Terra Cardial; Érika da Silva Maciel; Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca; Fernando Adami
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Genome-wide screen identifies a novel prognostic signature for breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Xuan Y Mao; Matthew J Lee; Jeffrey Zhu; Carissa Zhu; Sindy M Law; Antoine M Snijders
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-21

6.  Exosomal hsa-miR-21-5p is a biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Min Liu; Fei Mo; Xiaohan Song; Yun He; Yan Yuan; Jiaoyan Yan; Ye Yang; Jian Huang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Revisiting the impact of age and molecular subtype on overall survival after radiotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jian-Hua Mao; Paul J van Diest; Jesus Perez-Losada; Antoine M Snijders
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.