Literature DB >> 15269109

A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms.

Matthias Niemeier1, Herbert C Goltz, Anil Kuchinad, Douglas B Tweed, Tutis Vilis.   

Abstract

Here we examined the level of the lateral occipital (LO) area within the processing stream of the ventral visual cortex. An important determinant of an area's level of processing is whether it codes visual elements on both sides of the visual field, as do higher visual areas, or prefers those in the contralateral visual field, as do early visual areas. The former would suggest that LO, on one side, combines bilateral visual elements into a whole, while the latter suggests that it codes only the parts of forms. We showed that LO has a relative preference for visual objects in the contralateral visual field. LO responses were influenced by attention. However, relative changes in LO activity caused by changes in object location were preserved even when attention was shifted away from the objects to moving random dot patterns on the opposite side. Our data offer a new view on LO as an intermediate, but not a high-level, visual area in which neurons are driven by visual input and spatial attention in a multiplicative fashion.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15269109     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  30 in total

1.  Probing principles of large-scale object representation: category preference and location encoding.

Authors:  Radoslaw Martin Cichy; Philipp Sterzer; Jakob Heinzle; Lloyd T Elliott; Fernando Ramirez; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Cue-invariant networks for figure and background processing in human visual cortex.

Authors:  L Gregory Appelbaum; Alex R Wade; Vladimir Y Vildavski; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Serge O Dumoulin; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Neural substrates of perceptual integration during bistable object perception.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Antigona Martínez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Relating retinotopic and object-selective responses in human lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Rory Sayres; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Interactions between concentric form-from-structure and face perception revealed by visual masking but not adaptation.

Authors:  Eric Feczko; Gordon L Shulman; Steven E Petersen; John R Pruett
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Anatomy and white matter connections of the lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Ali H Palejwala; Kyle P O'Connor; Panayiotis Pelargos; Robert G Briggs; Camille K Milton; Andrew K Conner; Ty M Milligan; Daniel L O'Donoghue; Chad A Glenn; Michael E Sughrue
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Ventral and dorsal streams for choosing word order during sentence production.

Authors:  Malathi Thothathiri; Michelle Rattinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The lateral-occipital and the inferior-frontal cortex play different roles during the naming of visually presented objects.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Robert L Whitwell; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.