Literature DB >> 19441022

The lateral-occipital and the inferior-frontal cortex play different roles during the naming of visually presented objects.

Philippe A Chouinard1, Robert L Whitwell, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

We reasoned that if an area is devoted to processing only the visual features of objects, then transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to this area in either hemisphere would affect the naming of objects presented in contralateral but not ipsilateral space. In contrast, if an area is involved in language, then one might expect to see effects of TMS when applied over the left but not the right hemisphere, regardless whether objects are in contralateral or ipsilateral space. Our experiments reveal two important findings. First, TMS delivered to the lateral-occipital complex (LOC), a visual-form area, affected the naming of objects presented in contralateral but not ipsilateral space, independent of which hemisphere was stimulated. In two additional experiments, when participants named the color of objects or made judgments about the size of stimuli as shown physically on a computer screen, TMS over the contralateral LOC did not affect color naming but did affect the participants' ability to make size judgments. Second, TMS delivered to the left but not the right posterior inferior-frontal gyrus (pIFG) affected the naming of objects irrespective of whether objects were presented in contralateral or ipsilateral space. In a separate experiment, when participants were asked to either read or categorize words, TMS over the left but not the right pIFG affected word categorization but not word reading. On the basis of these findings, we propose that when people name visually-presented objects, LOC processes the visual form of objects while the left pIFG processes the semantics of objects. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19441022      PMCID: PMC6870619          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  42 in total

1.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Y Lerner; T Hendler; D Ben-Bashat; M Harel; R Malach
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Left posterior BA37 is involved in object recognition: a TMS study.

Authors:  L Stewart; B Meyer; U Frith; J Rothwell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Models of functional organization of the lateral prefrontal cortex in verbal working memory: evidence in favor of the process model.

Authors:  Laura H F Barde; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Common prefrontal regions coactivate with dissociable posterior regions during controlled semantic and phonological tasks.

Authors:  Brian T Gold; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Left mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: underlying principles of function.

Authors:  Penelope Kostopoulos; Michael Petrides
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition.

Authors:  K Tanaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; J R Gates; A Dhuna
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and hemispheric language dominance: usefulness and safety in epilepsy.

Authors:  R Michelucci; F Valzania; D Passarelli; M Santangelo; R Rizzi; A M Buzzi; A Tempestini; C A Tassinari
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 10.  Stimulating language: insights from TMS.

Authors:  Joseph T Devlin; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  10 in total

1.  The benefit of object interactions arises in the lateral occipital cortex independent of attentional modulation from the intraparietal sulcus: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Jiye G Kim; Irving Biederman; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dissociating semantic and phonological contributions of the left inferior frontal gyrus to language production.

Authors:  Jana Klaus; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Bruce Luber; Courtney A Crowell; Susan A Hilbig; Wesley Lim; Duy Nguyen; Nicolas A Chrapliwy; Simon W Davis; Roberto Cabeza; Sarah H Lisanby; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  fMRI reactivity to high-calorie food pictures predicts short- and long-term outcome in a weight-loss program.

Authors:  Donna L Murdaugh; James E Cox; Edwin W Cook; Rosalyn E Weller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Naming ability changes in physiological and pathological aging.

Authors:  Maria Cotelli; Rosa Manenti; Michela Brambilla; Orazio Zanetti; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  What have We Learned from "Perturbing" the Human Cortical Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation?

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Tomáš Paus
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  The Impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Reading Processes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  C Nikki Arrington; Alexandra E Ossowski; Humza Baig; Eileen Persichetti; Robin Morris
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  Preserved Haptic Shape Processing after Bilateral LOC Lesions.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Snow; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Medial temporal lobe contributions to intra-item associative recognition memory in the aging brain.

Authors:  Marshall Axel Dalton; Sicong Tu; Michael Hornberger; John Russel Hodges; Olivier Piguet
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Left Prefrontal Cortex Supports the Recognition of Meaningful Patterns in Ambiguous Stimuli.

Authors:  Grégory Bartel; Martin Marko; Imani Rameses; Claus Lamm; Igor Riečanský
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.