Literature DB >> 15262622

Prepared movements are elicited early by startle.

Anthony N Carlsen1, Romeo Chua, J Timothy Inglis, David J Sanderson, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

A startle stimulus has been shown to elicit a ballistic response in a reaction time (RT) task at very short latencies without involvement of the cerebral cortex (J. Valls-Sole, J. C. Rothwell, F. Gooulard, G. Cossu, & E. Munoz, 1999). The present authors examined the nature of the startle response. A simple RT task was used in which 8 participants performed arm extension movements to 3 target distances (20 degrees, 40 degrees, and 60 degrees ) in a blocked design. An unpredictable startling acoustic stimulus (124 dB) replaced the imperative stimulus in certain trials. The authors verified the presence of a startle response independent from the prepared response by observing electromyographic (EMG) activity in sternocleidomastoid and orbicularis oculi muscles. Findings indicated that when the participant was startled, the intended voluntary response was produced at significantly shorter response latencies. Furthermore, the kinematic variables of the observed response during startle trials for all 3 target distances were mostly unchanged. The EMG characteristics of the responses were not modified, indicating that the response produced was indeed the prepared and intended response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15262622     DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.36.3.253-264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  70 in total

1.  Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Quincy J Almeida; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Default motor preparation under conditions of response uncertainty.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.

Authors:  A J T Stevenson; C Chiu; D Maslovat; R Chua; B Gick; J-S Blouin; I M Franks
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  A startle speeds up the execution of externally guided saccades.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Hatice Kumru; Ana Queralt; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of task instruction on the excitability of spinal and supraspinal reflex pathways projecting to the biceps muscle.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Colum D MacKinnon; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Chris J Dakin; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effects of a startle on the sit-to-stand manoeuvre.

Authors:  Ana Queralt; Josep Valls-Solé; Juan M Castellote
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.