Literature DB >> 22138667

Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.

Anthony N Carlsen1, Quincy J Almeida, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

In reaction time (RT) tasks where fast ballistic movements are required, the requisite action is generally preplanned to enable the quickest responses. When a loud acoustic stimulus (e.g., >120 dB) that elicits a startle response is presented during the preplanning phase, the movement is triggered involuntarily and at a sufficiently short enough latency to discount normal cortical initiation processes. It has been suggested that the startle triggers the action by providing sufficient additional activation to surpass the initiation threshold. It is unclear, however, whether similar RT shortening due to startle would occur in the absence of an excitatory motor output. Thus, in the current study, participants performed a flexion force offset (i.e., inhibition) task within a simple RT paradigm. A startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) was presented in place of the usual "go" signal on several trials. Results from startle trials showed that the inhibitory command could be elicited substantially earlier by an SAS (latency of ~78 ms) compared to control trials (120 ms). This suggests active inhibition is preprogrammed and can be triggered early by startle in similar way to traditional "excitatory" tasks. Additionally, early startle-related EMG activity superimposed with the triggered offset suggests that the nature of the inhibitory command used in the current experiment involves the active suppression of ongoing motor output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22138667     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2964-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Role of brainstem-spinal projections in voluntary movement.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; C D MacKinnon; J Valls-Solé
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 10.338

2.  [CHANGES IN THE BRAIN POTENTIAL IN VOLUNTARY MOVEMENTS AND PASSIVE MOVEMENTS IN MAN: READINESS POTENTIAL AND REAFFERENT POTENTIALS].

Authors:  H H KORNHUBER; L DEECKE
Journal:  Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere       Date:  1965-05-10

3.  Relaxation from a voluntary contraction is preceded by increased excitability of motor cortical inhibitory circuits.

Authors:  Alessandro Buccolieri; Giovanni Abbruzzese; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Solé; Hatice Kumru; Markus Kofler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; D Restuccia; A Oliviero; P Profice; L Ferrara; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Reaction time and acoustic startle in normal human subjects.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; A Solé; F Valldeoriola; E Muñoz; L E Gonzalez; E S Tolosa
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-08-04       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Fast visuomotor processing made faster by sound.

Authors:  Raymond F Reynolds; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  4 in total

1.  Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Erin K Cressman; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neural processes mediating the preparation and release of focal motor output are suppressed or absent during imagined movement.

Authors:  Jeremy S Eagles; Anthony N Carlsen; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  StartReact during gait initiation reveals differential control of muscle activation and inhibition in patients with corticospinal degeneration.

Authors:  Bas J H van Lith; Milou J M Coppens; Jorik Nonnekes; Bart P C van de Warrenburg; Alexander C Geurts; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Oddball onset timing: Little evidence of early gating of oddball stimuli from tapping, reacting, and producing.

Authors:  Jordan Wehrman; Paul Sowman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.