OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the reliability of several parameters contributing to topographic motor cortical maps of the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) within able-bodied participants, across 3 sessions and from both hemispheres with greater precision than previously reported. METHODS: Nine healthy right-handed males aged 44-75 years were studied at 3 separate sessions, spaced 7-14 days apart. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the contralateral EDC. Closely spaced surface electrodes were used to record the MEPs. RESULTS: TMS-related parameters did not demonstrate a significant difference within participants across sessions and between hemispheres, with the exception of the hotspot distance, center of gravity distance, and normalized map volume. Hotspot and COG distances were determined from the Euclidean equation to calculate the distance in x,y coordinates traveled over sessions: one to two (distance A) and two to three (distance B). The hotspot distance, center of gravity distance and normalized map volume demonstrated a significant difference between right and left hemispheres, within participants. Adjusting for time and examining mean changes for hemispheres across sessions revealed that there was a 9-fold greater movement over sessions in the left hemisphere among these variables. CONCLUSIONS: TMS-related parameters are reliable within participants across 3 sessions. These data should be useful for planning and interpreting TMS studies using a healthy or patient population before and after an intervention.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the reliability of several parameters contributing to topographic motor cortical maps of the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) within able-bodied participants, across 3 sessions and from both hemispheres with greater precision than previously reported. METHODS: Nine healthy right-handed males aged 44-75 years were studied at 3 separate sessions, spaced 7-14 days apart. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEP) in the contralateral EDC. Closely spaced surface electrodes were used to record the MEPs. RESULTS: TMS-related parameters did not demonstrate a significant difference within participants across sessions and between hemispheres, with the exception of the hotspot distance, center of gravity distance, and normalized map volume. Hotspot and COG distances were determined from the Euclidean equation to calculate the distance in x,y coordinates traveled over sessions: one to two (distance A) and two to three (distance B). The hotspot distance, center of gravity distance and normalized map volume demonstrated a significant difference between right and left hemispheres, within participants. Adjusting for time and examining mean changes for hemispheres across sessions revealed that there was a 9-fold greater movement over sessions in the left hemisphere among these variables. CONCLUSIONS: TMS-related parameters are reliable within participants across 3 sessions. These data should be useful for planning and interpreting TMS studies using a healthy or patient population before and after an intervention.
Authors: Keith M McGregor; Haley Carpenter; Erin Kleim; Atchar Sudhyadhom; Keith D White; Andrew J Butler; Jeffrey Kleim; Bruce Crosson Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2012-03-31 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Lumy Sawaki; Andrew J Butler; Xiaoyan Leng; Peter A Wassenaar; Yousef M Mohammad; Sarah Blanton; K Sathian; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf; David C Good; George F Wittenberg Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.919