Literature DB >> 15257875

First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure--quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients.

René G Holzheimer1.   

Abstract

There are about 200,000 hernia repairs per year in Germany and about 770,000 in the U.S. In the United States most hernia repairs (80-90%) are performed as day surgery procedure; 90% of operations are open herniorrhaphies with mesh. Quality control includes the registration of complications, recurrence, and quality of life. In a prospective study 50 consecutive patients with inguinal hernia eligible for open mesh repair (modified Lichtenstein hernia repair), mostly Nyhus III and IV classification, were operated using light-weight Ultrapro-mesh (monocryl-prolene-composite, Ethicon Products), and interviewed 10 days after the operation according to a modified SF-36 questionnaire. Patients were examined three months later. There were 29 direct hernias, 21 combined (direct and indirect) hernias, 8 indirect hernias; 8 patients had hernias on both sides. 8 patients (16%) presented with recurrent hernias, mostly suture or laparoscopic repairs before. There were no intra-operative complications. 2 patients suffered from a moderate haematoma, which did not necessitate a surgical repair, after accidental intake of aspirin preoperatively in one case and after preoperative low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis. There were no other complications. All 50 patients (100%) had returned the questionnaire. 38 patients (78%) reported no or mild pain; only one patient (2%) suffered from severe pain, none had very severe pain. 32 patients (64%) applied no pain medication or only for 48 hours; only one patient (2%) used pain medication for more than 14 days. 34 patients (68%) admitted that their health status improved after the operation; 11 patients (22%) with good or very good health status indicated no change in health. Follow-up examination of the patients three months after the operation did not detect any recurrence. 49 patients (98%) were free of pain or restriction; one patient (2%) continued to have chronic pain which developed after two laparoscopic herniotomies performed at a different clinic before. There was no sign of mesh-related complication. The Ultrapro-mesh has been well accepted by the patients. In conclusion, open mesh repair according to Lichtenstein is safely done in specialised ambulatory day surgery clinics. Most patients benefit from this form of treatment according to a quality of life audit. The new light-weight mesh Ultrapro contributes to the improvement of hernia repair. There is evidence that ambulatory open mesh repair should be the method of choice for primary inguinal hernia. If in Germany an equal proportion of hernia repair as in the United States would be done as ambulatory procedure (80-90%), there would be an annual cost saving of several hundred million Euro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15257875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Res        ISSN: 0949-2321            Impact factor:   2.175


  10 in total

1.  Sutureless hernioplasty with light-weight mesh and fibrin glue versus Lichtenstein procedure: a comparison of outcomes focusing on chronic postoperative pain.

Authors:  R Lionetti; B Neola; S Dilillo; D Bruzzese; G P Ferulano
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Early results for new lightweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  L R Khan; S Kumar; S J Nixon
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes--a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Orlin Belyaev; Christophe Müller; Kirsten Meurer; Karl-Heinz Bauer; Georgios Papapostolou; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Classification of prosthetics used in hernia repair based on weight and biomaterial.

Authors:  A Coda; R Lamberti; S Martorana
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis on heavy and lightweight polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.

Authors:  M Śmietański; I A Śmietańska; A Modrzejewski; M P Simons; T J Aufenacker
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Early report of a randomized comparative clinical trial of Strattice™ reconstructive tissue matrix to lightweight synthetic mesh in the repair of inguinal hernias.

Authors:  C F Bellows; P Shadduck; W S Helton; R Martindale; B C Stouch; R Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Evidence-based assessment of the period of physical inactivity required after inguinal herniotomy.

Authors:  Hartmut Buhck; Mireille Untied; Wolf O Bechstein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Mesh size in Lichtenstein repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the importance of mesh size.

Authors:  D Seker; D Oztuna; H Kulacoglu; Y Genc; M Akcil
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Crossing mesh tails in the Lichtenstein repair method for medial (direct) inguinal hernia: recurrence and chronic pain rates after five years.

Authors:  A Sahin; E Ölcucuoglu; H Kulacoglu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  In vivo evaluation of a new composite mesh (10% polypropylene/90% poly-L-lactic acid) for hernia repair.

Authors:  Keitaro Tanaka; Didier Mutter; Harutaka Inoue; Véronique Lindner; George Bouras; Antonello Forgione; Joël Leroy; Marc Aprahamian; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 4.727

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.