Literature DB >> 17243000

In vivo evaluation of a new composite mesh (10% polypropylene/90% poly-L-lactic acid) for hernia repair.

Keitaro Tanaka1, Didier Mutter, Harutaka Inoue, Véronique Lindner, George Bouras, Antonello Forgione, Joël Leroy, Marc Aprahamian, Jacques Marescaux.   

Abstract

The increasing use of mesh insertion for groin hernia repair is dashed by a worrying prevalence of chronic pain frequently related as a reaction to the biomaterial implantation. Thus, new biocompatible prosthesis, designed as a composite material associating polypropylene (PP) and long-term absorbable material, are now under development. In the present study, the typical commercially available Prolene mesh has been compared to two new meshes designed with 3-fold less PP, either alone (light PP) or associated with poly-L-lactic acid (PP-PLA) accounting for 90% of the mesh weight. These PP-mesh variants were implanted in an extraperitoneal position within the abdominal wall of 90 rats. Mesh adhesion and size were determined at autopsy 2, 4 and 8 weeks after implantation (10 animals per group) and morphometric parameters of the host tissues by light microscopy. Prolene and light PP-meshes presented intra-corporeal shrinkage and tissue adhesion, both more pronounced with light-PP, whilst PP-PLA meshes were not affected in spite of a strongest fibrosis. In contrast to Prolene and even more with light PP meshes, inflammation and cell-mediated immune responses were reduced without occurrence of angiogenesis or oedema. All these findings advocate together for a better tolerance of this new composite biomaterial, more likely due to a low macrophage response that appeared statistically correlated to the absence of mesh shrinkage and to a decreased adhesion to the tissue. On the basis of these experimental observations, it could be expected that the better tolerance of this composite biomaterial may avoid both long-term pain and recurrence when used as plug in groin hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17243000     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-0090-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   4.727


  33 in total

1.  Use of marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias.

Authors:  F C USHER; J OCHSNER; L L TUTTLE
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1958-12       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Critical evaluation of prosthetic materials in repair of abdominal wall hernias: new criteria of tolerance and resistance.

Authors:  J P Arnaud; R Eloy; M Adloff; J F Grenier
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  [Pathology of traditional surgical nets for hernia repair after long-term implantation in humans].

Authors:  B Klosterhalfen; U Klinge; B Hermanns; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Absorbable versus permanent mesh in abdominal operations.

Authors:  J Tyrell; H Silberman; P Chandrasoma; J Niland; J Shull
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989-03

6.  First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure--quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients.

Authors:  René G Holzheimer
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  Integration of biomaterials implanted into abdominal wall: process of scar formation and macrophage response.

Authors:  J M Bellón; J Buján; L Contreras; A Hernando
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Inguinal hernioplasty with the Prolene Hernia System.

Authors:  J C Mayagoitia
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Influence of implantation interval on the long-term biocompatibility of surgical mesh.

Authors:  B Klosterhalfen; K Junge; B Hermanns; U Klinge
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Early results of a single-blinded, randomized, controlled, Internet-based multicenter trial comparing Prolene and Vypro II mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

Authors:  Sven Bringman; Timo-Jaakko Heikkinen; Staffan Wollert; Johanna Osterberg; Sam Smedberg; Håkan Granlund; Stig Ramel; Göran Felländer; Bo Anderberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  4 in total

1.  Open inguinal hernia repair with the use of a polyglycolic acid-trimethylene carbonate absorbable mesh: a pilot study.

Authors:  M Efthimiou; D Symeonidis; G Koukoulis; K Tepetes; D Zacharoulis; G Tzovaras
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Mesh repair of common abdominal hernias: a review on experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  R Penttinen; J M Grönroos
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  PerFix™ plug versus 4DDOME(®) implants for inguinal hernia repair: prospective multicentric randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Mutter; G Champault; D Binot; M Vix; J Leroy; J Marescaux
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Early results of comparison of polypropylene mesh and 75% resorbable mesh (monofilament polypropylene and poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) mesh) for laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Birol Agca; Yalin Iscan; Kemal Memisoglu
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2019-10-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.