Literature DB >> 23543334

Early report of a randomized comparative clinical trial of Strattice™ reconstructive tissue matrix to lightweight synthetic mesh in the repair of inguinal hernias.

C F Bellows1, P Shadduck, W S Helton, R Martindale, B C Stouch, R Fitzgibbons.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biologic grafts are rarely used for inguinal herniorrhaphy. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between patients undergoing a Lichtenstein's hernioplasty with a porcine mesh versus a standard synthetic.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded multicenter, evaluation of inguinal hernia repair was conducted between 2008 and 2010. Lichtenstein hernioplasty was performed using Strattice™ or lightweight polypropylene (Ultrapro) mesh. Quality of life, pain, overall complication rate, and recurrence were measured.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients were randomized to Strattice™ (n = 84) or Ultrapro (n = 88). At 3 months postoperatively, there were no differences on the occurrence or type of wound events [RR: 0.98 (95% CI 0.52-1.86, p = 0.69), Strattice™ (15 events) vs. Ultrapro (16 events)]. The mean level of impairment caused by the hernia, assessed by Activities Assessment Scale (AAS), significantly decreased postoperatively in both groups at 3 months (31% Strattice™ and 37% Ultrapro). Patients in the Strattice group reported significantly less postoperative pain during postoperative days 1 through 3 compared to Ultrapro patients. However, the amount of postoperative pain at 3 months, as assessed by the mean worst pain score on a visual analog scale and the Brief Pain Index, was similar between groups (95% CI 1.0-29.3). No hernia recurrences were observed in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Strattice™ is safe and effective in repairing inguinal hernia, with comparable intra-operative and early postoperative morbidity to synthetic mesh. Long-term follow-up is necessary in order to know whether the clinical outcomes of Strattice are equivalent to standard synthetic mesh in patients undergoing Lichtenstein's hernioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23543334     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1076-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  16 in total

1.  Vypro II mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mingtai Gao; Jianxu Han; Jinhui Tian; Kehu Yang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Impact of heavy polypropylene mesh and composite light polypropylene and polyglactin 910 on the inflammatory response.

Authors:  Gaetano Di Vita; Rosalia Patti; Tommaso Barrera; Francesco Arcoleo; Viviana Ferlazzo; Enrico Cillari
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 3.  Partially or completely absorbable versus nonabsorbable mesh repair for inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Fahreyar Alam; Tjun Y Tang; Stewart R Walsh; Umar Sadat
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 4.  Extracellular matrix biomaterials for soft tissue repair.

Authors:  Kevin G Cornwell; Adam Landsman; Kenneth S James
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.231

5.  The design of an industry-sponsored randomized controlled trial to compare synthetic mesh versus biologic mesh for inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  C F Bellows; P P Shadduck; W S Helton; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Assessment of patient functional status after surgery.

Authors:  Martin McCarthy; Olga Jonasson; Chih-Hung Chang; A Simon Pickard; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; James Gibbs; Perry Edelman; Robert Fitzgibbons; Leigh Neumayer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure--quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients.

Authors:  René G Holzheimer
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 2.175

8.  Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pain Suppl       Date:  1986

Review 9.  Epidemiologic, economic, and sociologic aspects of hernia surgery in the United States in the 1990s.

Authors:  I M Rutkow
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Comparison of three different mesh materials in tension-free inguinal hernia repair: prolene versus Vypro versus surgisis.

Authors:  F Puccio; M Solazzo; P Marciano
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Results from patient-reported outcome measures are inconsistently reported in inguinal hernia trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Gram-Hanssen; C Christophersen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.920

2.  Randomized Controlled Trial Of Lichtenstein Repair Of Indirect Inguinal Hernias With Two Biologic Meshes From Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa.

Authors:  Li Sun; Jie Chen; Yingmo Shen
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Allograft AlloDerm(®) tissue for laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal groin hernia repair: A case report.

Authors:  Bardia Amirlak; Jodi Gerdes; Varun Puri; Robert J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-26

4.  Results at 3-year follow-up of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia surgery with long-term resorbable mesh.

Authors:  F Ruiz-Jasbon; K Ticehurst; J Ahonen; J Norrby; P Falk; M-L Ivarsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs with porcine small intestine submucosa: a 5- year follow-up. a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Baoshan Li; Xin Zhang; Yi Man; Jiadong Xie; Wei Hu; Huang Huang; Yinlong Wang; Hongguang Ma
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 6.  Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair - Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ferdinand Köckerling; Nasra N Alam; Sunil K Narang; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 7.  Comparison of Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa versus Polypropylene in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xin Nie; Dongdong Xiao; Wenyue Wang; Zhicheng Song; Zhi Yang; Yuanwen Chen; Yan Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.