Literature DB >> 18711125

Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics.

William M Brown1, Michael E Price, Jinsheng Kang, Nicholas Pound, Yue Zhao, Hui Yu.   

Abstract

Body size and shape seem to have been sexually selected in a variety of species, including humans, but little is known about what attractive bodies signal about underlying genotypic or phenotypic quality. A widely used indicator of phenotypic quality in evolutionary analyses is degree of symmetry (i.e., fluctuating asymmetry, FA) because it is a marker of developmental stability, which is defined as an organism's ability to develop toward an adaptive end-point despite perturbations during its ontogeny. Here we sought to establish whether attractive bodies signal low FA to observers, and, if so, which aspects of attractive bodies are most predictive of lower FA. We used a 3D optical body scanner to measure FA and to isolate size and shape characteristics in a sample of 77 individuals (40 males and 37 females). From the 3D body scan data, 360 degrees videos were created that separated body shape from other aspects of visual appearance (e.g., skin color and facial features). These videos then were presented to 87 evaluators for attractiveness ratings. We found strong negative correlations between FA and bodily attractiveness in both sexes. Further, sex-typical body size and shape characteristics were rated as attractive and correlated negatively with FA. Finally, geometric morphometric analysis of joint configurations revealed that sex-typical joint configurations were associated with both perceived attractiveness and lower FA for male but not for female bodies. In sum, body size and shape seem to show evidence of sexual selection and indicate important information about the phenotypic quality of individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18711125      PMCID: PMC2529114          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0710420105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  Fluctuating Asymmetry as a Bioindicator of Stress: Comparing Efficacy of Analyses Involving Multiple Traits.

Authors:  Brian Leung; Mark R Forbes; David Houle
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Is symmetry a visual cue to attractiveness in the human female body?

Authors: 
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 4.178

3.  Tall men have more reproductive success.

Authors:  B Pawlowski; R I Dunbar; A Lipowicz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The sexual selection continuum.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sexual dimorphism in lizard body shape: the roles of sexual selection and fecundity selection.

Authors:  Mats Olsson; Richard Shine; Erik Wapstra; Beata Uivari; Thomas Madsen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Visual perception of female physical attractiveness.

Authors:  J Fan; F Liu; J Wu; W Dai
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Jamaican Symmetry Project: long-term study of fluctuating asymmetry in rural Jamaican children.

Authors:  R Trivers; J T Manning; R Thornhill; D Singh; M McGuire
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.553

9.  Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the yellow dung fly.

Authors:  W U Blanckenhorn; U Kraushaar; C Reim
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Time of contact and step length: the effect of limb length, running speed, load carrying and incline.

Authors:  D F Hoyt; S J Wickler; E A Cogger
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  12 in total

1.  Smoking affects womens' sex hormone-regulated body form.

Authors:  Mari Pölkki; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Yingjun Lu; Jingmei Wang; Ling Wang; Junli Wang; Jinliang Qin
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Does masculinity matter? The contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans.

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Nicholas Pound; Ian D Stephen; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Dimorphism in Human Facial Morphology: A Multi-Variate Study.

Authors:  Omid Ekrami; Peter Claes; Ellen Van Assche; Mark D Shriver; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Susan Walsh; Stefan Van Dongen
Journal:  Symmetry (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.713

5.  Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive.

Authors:  José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes; Marta Iglesias-Julios; Miguel Pita; Enrique Turiegano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The morphometrics of "masculinity" in human faces.

Authors:  Philipp Mitteroecker; Sonja Windhager; Gerd B Müller; Katrin Schaefer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sex-biased sound symbolism in english-language first names.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pitcher; Alex Mesoudi; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do men's faces really signal heritable immunocompetence?

Authors:  Isabel M L Scott; Andrew P Clark; Lynda G Boothroyd; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  "I like the way you move": how hormonal changes across the menstrual cycle affect female perceptions of gait.

Authors:  Rick van der Zwan; Natasha Herbert
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-08-21

10.  Body shape preferences: associations with rater body shape and sociosexuality.

Authors:  Michael E Price; Nicholas Pound; James Dunn; Sian Hopkins; Jinsheng Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.