Christian Frei1, Daniel Buser, Karl Dula. 1. Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether cross-section imaging influences the planning and therapy of standard implant cases in the posterior mandible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study conducted over 16 months, the planned treatment (standard implant therapy without bone augmentation procedures in the premolar and molar regions of the mandible) was compared with the postoperative result in 50 randomly selected patients. Clinical examinations and panoramic radiographs were performed pre- and postoperatively, whereas cross-sectional tomography was performed only preoperatively. RESULTS: The vertical magnification factor in the panoramic radiographs was very constant pre- and postoperatively with 1 : 1.27 and in the spiral tomograms with 1 : 1.52. In 11 of 77 implant sites, the mandibular canal could not be evaluated in the spiral tomograms. The additional information from cross-sectional spiral tomography did not influence the original planning in 74 of 77 (96.1%) implant sites. Based on the postoperative panoramic radiograph, the average distance from the tip of the implants to the mandibular canal was 3.04+/-2.06 mm. In two cases (2.6%), transient postoperative altered tactile sensation of the mental nerve was found. CONCLUSION: The information from preoperative cross-sectional spiral tomography has minor impact on treatment planning in standard implant cases in mandibular premolar and molar regions. The clinical examination provides sufficient information for selecting implant diameter and the panoramic radiograph provides sufficient information for implant length selection.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether cross-section imaging influences the planning and therapy of standard implant cases in the posterior mandible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study conducted over 16 months, the planned treatment (standard implant therapy without bone augmentation procedures in the premolar and molar regions of the mandible) was compared with the postoperative result in 50 randomly selected patients. Clinical examinations and panoramic radiographs were performed pre- and postoperatively, whereas cross-sectional tomography was performed only preoperatively. RESULTS: The vertical magnification factor in the panoramic radiographs was very constant pre- and postoperatively with 1 : 1.27 and in the spiral tomograms with 1 : 1.52. In 11 of 77 implant sites, the mandibular canal could not be evaluated in the spiral tomograms. The additional information from cross-sectional spiral tomography did not influence the original planning in 74 of 77 (96.1%) implant sites. Based on the postoperative panoramic radiograph, the average distance from the tip of the implants to the mandibular canal was 3.04+/-2.06 mm. In two cases (2.6%), transient postoperative altered tactile sensation of the mental nerve was found. CONCLUSION: The information from preoperative cross-sectional spiral tomography has minor impact on treatment planning in standard implant cases in mandibular premolar and molar regions. The clinical examination provides sufficient information for selecting implant diameter and the panoramic radiograph provides sufficient information for implant length selection.
Authors: L Vazquez; Y Nizamaldin; C Combescure; R Nedir; M Bischof; D M Dohan Ehrenfest; J-P Carrel; U C Belser Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.419