Literature DB >> 15231753

Global survey of chromatin accessibility using DNA microarrays.

M Ryan Weil1, Piotr Widlak, John D Minna, Harold R Garner.   

Abstract

An increasing number of studies indicate a central role for chromatin remodeling in the regulation of gene expression. Current methods for high-resolution studies of the relationship between chromatin accessibility and transcription are low throughput, making a genome-wide study impractical. To enable the simultaneous measurement of the global chromatin accessibility state at the resolution of single genes, we developed the Chromatin Array technique, in which chromatin is separated by its condensation state using either the solubility differences of mono- and oligonucleosomes in specific buffers or controlled DNase I digestion and selection of the large refractory (condensed) DNA fragments. By probing with a comparative genomic hybridization style microarray, we can determine the condensation state of thousands of individual loci and correlate this with transcriptional activity. Applying this technique to the breast tumor model cell line, MCF7, we found that when the condensation is homogeneous in the population of cells, expression is inversely proportional to the level of accessibility and the two methods of accessibility-based target selection correlate well. Using functional annotation and comparative genomic hybridization data, we have begun to decipher the possible biological implications of the relationship between chromatin accessibility and expression. Copyright 2004 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15231753      PMCID: PMC442154          DOI: 10.1101/gr.1396104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  38 in total

1.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays.

Authors:  J R Pollack; C M Perou; A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S S Jeffrey; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  DNA arrays for analysis of gene expression.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P O Brown
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Variation in radiation-induced formation of DNA double-strand breaks as a function of chromatin structure.

Authors:  R L Warters; B W Lyons
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Sequence-specific antirepression of histone H1-mediated inhibition of basal RNA polymerase II transcription.

Authors:  G E Croston; L A Kerrigan; L M Lira; D R Marshak; J T Kadonaga
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  A gene map of the human genome.

Authors:  G D Schuler; M S Boguski; E A Stewart; L D Stein; G Gyapay; K Rice; R E White; P Rodriguez-Tomé; A Aggarwal; E Bajorek; S Bentolila; B B Birren; A Butler; A B Castle; N Chiannilkulchai; A Chu; C Clee; S Cowles; P J Day; T Dibling; N Drouot; I Dunham; S Duprat; C East; C Edwards; J B Fan; N Fang; C Fizames; C Garrett; L Green; D Hadley; M Harris; P Harrison; S Brady; A Hicks; E Holloway; L Hui; S Hussain; C Louis-Dit-Sully; J Ma; A MacGilvery; C Mader; A Maratukulam; T C Matise; K B McKusick; J Morissette; A Mungall; D Muselet; H C Nusbaum; D C Page; A Peck; S Perkins; M Piercy; F Qin; J Quackenbush; S Ranby; T Reif; S Rozen; C Sanders; X She; J Silva; D K Slonim; C Soderlund; W L Sun; P Tabar; T Thangarajah; N Vega-Czarny; D Vollrath; S Voyticky; T Wilmer; X Wu; M D Adams; C Auffray; N A Walter; R Brandon; A Dehejia; P N Goodfellow; R Houlgatte; J R Hudson; S E Ide; K R Iorio; W Y Lee; N Seki; T Nagase; K Ishikawa; N Nomura; C Phillips; M H Polymeropoulos; M Sandusky; K Schmitt; R Berry; K Swanson; R Torres; J C Venter; J M Sikela; J S Beckmann; J Weissenbach; R M Myers; D R Cox; M R James; D Bentley; P Deloukas; E S Lander; T J Hudson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Sperm nuclear chromatin transformations in somatic cell-free extracts.

Authors:  S Banerjee; M A Hulten
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  Varigated chromatin structures of mouse ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  A H Davis; T L Reudelhuber; W T Garrard
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-06-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Differentiation-dependent chromatin alterations precede and accompany transcription of immunoglobulin light chain genes.

Authors:  S M Rose; W T Garrard
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1984-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  A genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle.

Authors:  R J Cho; M J Campbell; E A Winzeler; L Steinmetz; A Conway; L Wodicka; T G Wolfsberg; A E Gabrielian; D Landsman; D J Lockhart; R W Davis
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  A developmentally modulated chromatin structure at the mouse immunoglobulin kappa 3' enhancer.

Authors:  M C Roque; P A Smith; V C Blasquez
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Applying whole-genome studies of epigenetic regulation to study human disease.

Authors:  J D Lieb; S Beck; M L Bulyk; P Farnham; N Hattori; S Henikoff; X S Liu; K Okumura; K Shiota; T Ushijima; J M Greally
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Distinct modes of DNA accessibility in plant chromatin.

Authors:  Huan Shu; Thomas Wildhaber; Alexey Siretskiy; Wilhelm Gruissem; Lars Hennig
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  Chromatin remodeling in mammary gland differentiation and breast tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Tim H-M Huang; Manel Esteller
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Flexibility and constraint in the nucleosome core landscape of Caenorhabditis elegans chromatin.

Authors:  Steven M Johnson; Frederick J Tan; Heather L McCullough; Daniel P Riordan; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Maps of cis-Regulatory Nodes in Megabase Long Genome Segments are an Inevitable Intermediate Step Toward Whole Genome Functional Mapping.

Authors:  Lev G Nikolaev; Sergey B Akopov; Igor P Chernov; Eugene D Sverdlov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.236

6.  Genome-wide profiling of salt fractions maps physical properties of chromatin.

Authors:  Steven Henikoff; Jorja G Henikoff; Akiko Sakai; Gabriel B Loeb; Kami Ahmad
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Measuring Arabidopsis chromatin accessibility using DNase I-polymerase chain reaction and DNase I-chip assays.

Authors:  Huan Shu; Wilhelm Gruissem; Lars Hennig
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Reversing chromatin accessibility differences that distinguish homologous mitotic metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  Wahab A Khan; Peter K Rogan; Joan H M Knoll
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.009

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.