Literature DB >> 15230342

Allometric scaling of pharmacokinetic parameters in drug discovery: can human CL, Vss and t1/2 be predicted from in-vivo rat data?

Gary W Caldwell1, John A Masucci, Zhengyin Yan, William Hageman.   

Abstract

In a drug discovery environment, reasonable go/no-go human in-vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) decisions must be made in a timely manner with a minimum amount of animal in-vivo or in-vitro data. We have investigated the accuracy of the in-vivo correlation between rat and human for the prediction of the total systemic clearance (CL), the volume of distribution at steady state (Vss), and the half-life (t1/2) using simple allometric scaling techniques. We have shown, using a large diverse set of drugs, that a fixed exponent allometric scaling approach can be used to predict human in-vivo PK parameters CL, Vss and t(1/2) solely from rat in-vivo PK data with acceptable accuracy for making go/no-go decisions in drug discovery. Human in-vivo PK predictions can be obtained using the simple allometric scaling relationships CL(Human) approximately = 40 CL(Rat) (L/hr), Vss(Human) approximately = 200 Vss(Rat) (L), and t1/2(Human) approximately = 4 t1/2(Rat) (hr). The average fold error for human CL predictions for N = 176 drugs was 2.25 with 79% of the drugs having a fold error less than 3. The average fold error for human Vss predictions for N = 144 drugs was 1.85 with 84% of the drugs having a fold error less than 3. The average fold error for human t1/2 predictions for N = 145 drugs was 2.05 with 76% of the drugs having a fold error less than 3. Using these simple allometric relationships, the sorting of drug candidates into a low/medium/high/very high human classification scheme was also possible from rat data. Since these simple allometric relationships between rat and human CL, Vss, and t1/2 are reasonably accurate, easy to remember and simple to calculate, these equations should be useful for making early go/no-go in-vivo human PK decisions for drug discovery candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230342     DOI: 10.1007/BF03190588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  49 in total

1.  Lead optimization in 12 months? True confessions of a chemistry team.

Authors:  S J.F. Macdonald; P W. Smith
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Similarity in the linear and non-linear oral absorption of drugs between human and rat.

Authors:  W L Chiou; C Ma; S M Chung; T C Wu; H Y Jeong
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.366

3.  Pharmacokinetics and interspecies scaling of a novel VEGF receptor inhibitor, SU5416.

Authors:  J Sukbuntherng; G Cropp; A Hannah; G S Wagner; L K Shawver; L Antonian
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.765

Review 4.  Risk assessment of environmental chemicals.

Authors:  A Fan; R Howd; B Davis
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 13.820

5.  Linear correlation of the fraction of oral dose absorbed of 64 drugs between humans and rats.

Authors:  W L Chiou; A Barve
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  The use of human hepatocytes to select compounds based on their expected hepatic extraction ratios in humans.

Authors:  T Lavé; S Dupin; C Schmitt; B Valles; G Ubeaud; R C Chou; D Jaeck; P Coassolo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Predicting toxicokinetic parameters in humans from toxicokinetic data acquired from three small mammalian species.

Authors:  K Bachmann
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.446

8.  [Pharmacokinetic properties of rithmidazole upon single intravenous introduction].

Authors:  A A Spasov; A V Stepanov; L A Smirnova; V I Petrov; I G Shabasheva
Journal:  Eksp Klin Farmakol       Date:  2002 May-Jun

9.  Comparison of oral absorption and bioavailablity of drugs between monkey and human.

Authors:  Win L Chiou; Paul W Buehler
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Estimating xenobiotic half-lives in humans from rat data: influence of log P.

Authors:  J G Sarver; D White; P Erhardt; K Bachmann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Overcoming Gene-Delivery Hurdles: Physiological Considerations for Nonviral Vectors.

Authors:  Andrew B Hill; Mingfu Chen; Chih-Kuang Chen; Blaine A Pfeifer; Charles H Jones
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  Multi-functional scaling methodology for translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic applications using integrated microphysiological systems (MPS).

Authors:  Christian Maass; Cynthia L Stokes; Linda G Griffith; Murat Cirit
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Strategy for Extending Half-life in Drug Design and Its Significance.

Authors:  Hakan Gunaydin; Michael D Altman; J Michael Ellis; Peter Fuller; Scott A Johnson; Brian Lahue; Blair Lapointe
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and metabolic characterization of a brain retentive microtubule (MT)-stabilizing triazolopyrimidine.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Cornec; Michael J James; Jane Kovalevich; John Q Trojanowski; Virginia M-Y Lee; Amos B Smith; Carlo Ballatore; Kurt R Brunden
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  The use of the suicide CYP450 inhibitor ABT for distinguishing absorption and metabolism processes in in-vivo pharmacokinetic screens.

Authors:  Gary W Caldwell; David M Ritchie; John A Masucci; William Hageman; Carlos Cotto; Jeffrey Hall; Becki Hasting; William Jones
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

6.  Discovery and Optimization of Selective Nav1.8 Modulator Series That Demonstrate Efficacy in Preclinical Models of Pain.

Authors:  Sharan K Bagal; Peter J Bungay; Stephen M Denton; Karl R Gibson; Melanie S Glossop; Tanya L Hay; Mark I Kemp; Charlotte A L Lane; Mark L Lewis; Graham N Maw; William A Million; C Elizabeth Payne; Cedric Poinsard; David J Rawson; Blanda L Stammen; Edward B Stevens; Lisa R Thompson
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  PEGylation of a High-Affinity Anti-(+)Methamphetamine Single Chain Antibody Fragment Extends Functional Half-Life by Reducing Clearance.

Authors:  Emily E Reichard; Nisha Nanaware-Kharade; Guillermo A Gonzalez; Shraddha Thakkar; S Michael Owens; Eric C Peterson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  A mouse-human phase 1 co-clinical trial of a protease-activated fluorescent probe for imaging cancer.

Authors:  Melodi Javid Whitley; Diana M Cardona; Alexander L Lazarides; Ivan Spasojevic; Jorge M Ferrer; Joan Cahill; Chang-Lung Lee; Matija Snuderl; Dan G Blazer; E Shelley Hwang; Rachel A Greenup; Paul J Mosca; Jeffrey K Mito; Kyle C Cuneo; Nicole A Larrier; Erin K O'Reilly; Richard F Riedel; William C Eward; David B Strasfeld; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain; W David Lee; Linda G Griffith; Moungi G Bawendi; David G Kirsch; Brian E Brigman
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Projection of exposure and efficacious dose prior to first-in-human studies: how successful have we been?

Authors:  Christine Huang; Ming Zheng; Zheng Yang; A David Rodrigues; Punit Marathe
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Craving espresso: the dialetics in classifying caffeine as an abuse drug.

Authors:  Max Kenedy Felix Dos Santos; Elaine C Gavioli; Lorena Santa Rosa; Vanessa de Paula Soares-Rachetti; Bruno Lobão-Soares
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.