Literature DB >> 26738797

A mouse-human phase 1 co-clinical trial of a protease-activated fluorescent probe for imaging cancer.

Melodi Javid Whitley1, Diana M Cardona2, Alexander L Lazarides3, Ivan Spasojevic4, Jorge M Ferrer5, Joan Cahill6, Chang-Lung Lee6, Matija Snuderl7, Dan G Blazer8, E Shelley Hwang8, Rachel A Greenup8, Paul J Mosca8, Jeffrey K Mito1, Kyle C Cuneo6, Nicole A Larrier6, Erin K O'Reilly9, Richard F Riedel10, William C Eward11, David B Strasfeld5, Dai Fukumura7, Rakesh K Jain7, W David Lee5, Linda G Griffith12, Moungi G Bawendi13, David G Kirsch14, Brian E Brigman11.   

Abstract

Local recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure for patients with solid tumors. Intraoperative detection of microscopic residual cancer in the tumor bed could be used to decrease the risk of a positive surgical margin, reduce rates of reexcision, and tailor adjuvant therapy. We used a protease-activated fluorescent imaging probe, LUM015, to detect cancer in vivo in a mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and ex vivo in a first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial. In mice, intravenous injection of LUM015 labeled tumor cells, and residual fluorescence within the tumor bed predicted local recurrence. In 15 patients with STS or breast cancer, intravenous injection of LUM015 before surgery was well tolerated. Imaging of resected human tissues showed that fluorescence from tumor was significantly higher than fluorescence from normal tissues. LUM015 biodistribution, pharmacokinetic profiles, and metabolism were similar in mouse and human subjects. Tissue concentrations of LUM015 and its metabolites, including fluorescently labeled lysine, demonstrated that LUM015 is selectively distributed to tumors where it is activated by proteases. Experiments in mice with a constitutively active PEGylated fluorescent imaging probe support a model where tumor-selective probe distribution is a determinant of increased fluorescence in cancer. These co-clinical studies suggest that the tumor specificity of protease-activated imaging probes, such as LUM015, is dependent on both biodistribution and enzyme activity. Our first-in-human data support future clinical trials of LUM015 and other protease-sensitive probes.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26738797      PMCID: PMC4794335          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad0293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  38 in total

1.  Molecular imaging in cancer.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program.

Authors:  W D Dupont; W D Plummer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1990-04

3.  Analysis of prognostic factors in 1,041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Authors:  P W Pisters; D H Leung; J Woodruff; W Shi; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Cysteine cathepsins: multifunctional enzymes in cancer.

Authors:  Mona Mostafa Mohamed; Bonnie F Sloane
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments.

Authors:  Claire E Lewis; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Randomized prospective study of the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity.

Authors:  J C Yang; A E Chang; A R Baker; W F Sindelar; D N Danforth; S L Topalian; T DeLaney; E Glatstein; S M Steinberg; M J Merino; S A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A new mouse model to explore the initiation, progression, and therapy of BRAFV600E-induced lung tumors.

Authors:  David Dankort; Elena Filenova; Manuel Collado; Manuel Serrano; Kirk Jones; Martin McMahon
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins.

Authors:  Juan C Cendán; Dominique Coco; Edward M Copeland
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy.

Authors:  M S Anscher; P Jones; L R Prosnitz; W Blackstock; M Hebert; R Reddick; A Tucker; R Dodge; G Leight; J D Iglehart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  In vivo imaging of tumors with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes.

Authors:  R Weissleder; C H Tung; U Mahmood; A Bogdanov
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  80 in total

Review 1.  Oncologic Procedures Amenable to Fluorescence-guided Surgery.

Authors:  Kiranya E Tipirneni; Jason M Warram; Lindsay S Moore; Andrew C Prince; Esther de Boer; Aditi H Jani; Irene L Wapnir; Joseph C Liao; Michael Bouvet; Nicole K Behnke; Mary T Hawn; George A Poultsides; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; William R Carroll; Kurt R Zinn; Eben Rosenthal
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Utilization of targeted near-infrared molecular imaging to improve pulmonary metastasectomy of osteosarcomas.

Authors:  Jarrod D Predina; Andrew Newton; Charuhas Deshpande; Philip Low; Sunil Singhal
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  CORR® Tumor Board: Can Navigation Improve the Ability to Achieve Tumor-free Margins in Pelvic and Sacral Primary Bone Sarcoma Resections? A Historically Controlled Study.

Authors:  Megan E Anderson; Jim S Wu; Sara O Vargas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Clinical feasibility of optical coherence micro-elastography for imaging tumor margins in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Wes M Allen; Ken Y Foo; Renate Zilkens; Kelsey M Kennedy; Qi Fang; Lixin Chin; Benjamin F Dessauvagie; Bruce Latham; Christobel M Saunders; Brendan F Kennedy
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  Advances in fluorescent-image guided surgery.

Authors:  Mark J Landau; Daniel J Gould; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

6.  Algorithms for differentiating between images of heterogeneous tissue across fluorescence microscopes.

Authors:  Rhea Chitalia; Jenna Mueller; Henry L Fu; Melodi Javid Whitley; David G Kirsch; J Quincy Brown; Rebecca Willett; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Emerging Intraoperative Imaging Modalities to Improve Surgical Precision.

Authors:  Israt S Alam; Idan Steinberg; Ophir Vermesh; Nynke S van den Berg; Eben L Rosenthal; Gooitzen M van Dam; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Sophie Hernot; Stephan Rogalla
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 8.  Early detection of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Stephen P Pereira; Lucy Oldfield; Alexander Ney; Phil A Hart; Margaret G Keane; Stephen J Pandol; Debiao Li; William Greenhalf; Christie Y Jeon; Eugene J Koay; Christopher V Almario; Christopher Halloran; Anne Marie Lennon; Eithne Costello
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-03-02

Review 9.  Optical Surgical Navigation for Precision in Tumor Resections.

Authors:  Stefan Harmsen; Nutte Teraphongphom; Michael F Tweedle; James P Basilion; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  NIR-emissive PEG-b-TCL micelles for breast tumor imaging and minimally invasive pharmacokinetic analysis.

Authors:  Christina L Hofmann; Melanie C O'Sullivan; Alexandre Detappe; Yingjie Yu; Xi Yang; Wei Qi; Chelsea D Landon; Michael J Therien; Mark W Dewhirst; P Peter Ghoroghchian; Gregory M Palmer
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 7.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.