PURPOSE: Preclinical and clinical data for 35 proprietary Bristol-Myers Squibb discovery compounds (years 1997 to 2005) were collected and analyzed. In each case, exposure and efficacy in human subjects were projected at the time of nomination (for development) prior to first-in-human dosing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Projections of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) in humans involved the use of one or more methods: (1) allometric scaling of animal pharmacokinetic data; (2) clearance projection employing in vitro data (liver microsomes and hepatocytes); (3) chimpanzee as an animal model; (4) the species-invariant time method; and (5) the Css-mean residence time or "Css-MRT" method. Whenever possible, prior clinical experience with lead compounds enabled the selection of the most appropriate method(s). Multiple approaches were also available at the time of the human efficacious dose projections: (1) efficacious exposure from animal efficacy models; (2) in vitro potency; and (3) prior experience with clinical leads. RESULTS: Over the 8 year period described, AUC in humans was projected within 2-fold (20 out of 35 compounds; 57%), greater than 2-fold to 4-fold (11 out of 35 compounds; 32%), and greater than 4-fold (4 out of 35 compounds; 11%) of the observed value. At the time of writing, clinical efficacy data were available for 10 compounds only. In this instance, the efficacious doses were also projected within 2-fold (7 out of 10 compounds; 70%), greater than 2-fold to 4-fold (2 out of 10 compounds; 20%), and greater than 4-fold (1 out of 10 compounds; 10%) of the actual clinical dose. CONCLUSION: Overall, it was possible to project human exposure and efficacious dose within 4-fold of observed clinical values for about 90% of the compounds.
PURPOSE: Preclinical and clinical data for 35 proprietary Bristol-Myers Squibb discovery compounds (years 1997 to 2005) were collected and analyzed. In each case, exposure and efficacy in human subjects were projected at the time of nomination (for development) prior to first-in-human dosing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Projections of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) in humans involved the use of one or more methods: (1) allometric scaling of animal pharmacokinetic data; (2) clearance projection employing in vitro data (liver microsomes and hepatocytes); (3) chimpanzee as an animal model; (4) the species-invariant time method; and (5) the Css-mean residence time or "Css-MRT" method. Whenever possible, prior clinical experience with lead compounds enabled the selection of the most appropriate method(s). Multiple approaches were also available at the time of the human efficacious dose projections: (1) efficacious exposure from animal efficacy models; (2) in vitro potency; and (3) prior experience with clinical leads. RESULTS: Over the 8 year period described, AUC in humans was projected within 2-fold (20 out of 35 compounds; 57%), greater than 2-fold to 4-fold (11 out of 35 compounds; 32%), and greater than 4-fold (4 out of 35 compounds; 11%) of the observed value. At the time of writing, clinical efficacy data were available for 10 compounds only. In this instance, the efficacious doses were also projected within 2-fold (7 out of 10 compounds; 70%), greater than 2-fold to 4-fold (2 out of 10 compounds; 20%), and greater than 4-fold (1 out of 10 compounds; 10%) of the actual clinical dose. CONCLUSION: Overall, it was possible to project human exposure and efficacious dose within 4-fold of observed clinical values for about 90% of the compounds.
Authors: P Turrini; R Sasso; S Germoni; I Marcucci; A Celluci; A Di Marco; E Marra; G Paonessa; A Eutropi; R Laufer; G Migliaccio; J Padron Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Gary W Caldwell; John A Masucci; Zhengyin Yan; William Hageman Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2004 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.441