Literature DB >> 15221370

Consistency of staining and reporting of oestrogen receptor immunocytochemistry within the European Union--an inter-laboratory study.

C A Wells1, J P Sloane, D Coleman, C Munt, I Amendoeira, N Apostolikas, J P Bellocq, S Bianchi, W Boecker, G Bussolati, C E Connolly, P Dervan, M Drijkoningen, I O Ellis, C W Elston, V Eusebi, D Faverly, P Heikkila, R Holland, J Jacquemier, M Lacerda, J Martinez-Penuela, C De Miguel, J L Peterse, F Rank, A Reiner, E Saksela, B Sigal-Zafrani, M Sylvan, B Borisch, G Cserni, T Decker, H Kerner, J Kulka, P Regitnig, A Sapino, A M Tanous, S Thorstenson, E Zozaya.   

Abstract

To assess the variability of oestrogen receptor (ER) testing using immunocytochemistry, centrally stained and unstained slides from breast cancers were circulated to the members of the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology, who were asked to report on both slides. The results showed that there was almost complete concordance among readers (kappa=0.95) in ER-negative tumours on the stained slide and excellent concordance among readers (kappa=0.82) on the slides stained in each individual laboratory. Tumours showing strong positivity were reasonably well assessed (kappa=0.57 and 0.4, respectively), but there was less concordance in tumours with moderate and low levels of ER, especially when these were heterogeneous in their staining. Because of the variation, the Working Group recommends that laboratories performing these stains should take part in a external quality assurance scheme for immunocytochemistry, should include a tumour with low ER levels as a weak positive control and should audit the percentage positive tumours in their laboratory against the accepted norms annually. The Quick score method of receptor assessment may also have too many categories for good concordance, and grouping of these into fewer categories may remove some of the variation among laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221370     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-004-1063-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  16 in total

1.  Oestrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer: past, present and future.

Authors:  D M Barnes; A M Hanby
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.087

2.  The effect of fixation and processing on the sensitivity of oestrogen receptor assay by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  H Lee; A G Douglas-Jones; J M Morgan; B Jasani
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Quality assurance for detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors by immunohistochemistry in Austrian pathology laboratories.

Authors:  Peter Regitnig; Angelika Reiner; Hans-Peter Dinges; Gerald Höfler; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Sigurd F Lax; Peter Obrist; Margaretha Rudas; Franz Quehenberger
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen and progesterone receptors: correlation of standards achieved on in house tumours with that achieved on external quality assessment material in over 150 laboratories from 26 countries.

Authors:  A Rhodes; B Jasani; A J Balaton; K D Miller
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Estrogen receptor analysis in primary breast tumors by ligand-binding assay, immunocytochemical assay, and northern blot: a comparison.

Authors:  M Lacroix; G Querton; P Hennebert; D Larsimont; G Leclercq
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Immunohistochemical detection of steroid receptors in breast cancer: a working protocol. UK Receptor Group, UK NEQAS, The Scottish Breast Cancer Pathology Group, and The Receptor and Biomarker Study Group of the EORTC.

Authors:  R Leake; D Barnes; S Pinder; I Ellis; L Anderson; T Anderson; R Adamson; T Rhodes; K Miller; R Walker
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR), by ligand-binding assay compared with ER, PgR and pS2, by immuno-histochemistry in predicting response to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  R M Elledge; S Green; R Pugh; D C Allred; G M Clark; J Hill; P Ravdin; S Martino; C K Osborne
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-03-20       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Immunohistochemical expression of hormone receptors in invasive breast carcinoma: correlation of results of H-score with pathological parameters.

Authors:  A A Thike; M J Chng; S Fook-Chong; P H Tan
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.306

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  [Interlaboratory trials for quality assurance of breast cancer biomarkers in Germany].

Authors:  C A Krusche; R von Wasielewski; J Rüschoff; A Fisseler-Eckhoff; H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Implementation of External Quality Assurance Trials for Immunohistochemically Determined Breast Cancer Biomarkers in Germany.

Authors:  Reinhard von Wasielewski; Claudia A Krusche; Joseph Rüschoff; Anette Fisseler-Eckhoff; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Proficiency testing of immunohistochemical biomarker assays in breast cancer.

Authors:  Reinhard von Wasielewski; Svenja Hasselmann; Josef Rüschoff; Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Adipokines, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer recurrence: a cohort study.

Authors:  Sang Woo Oh; Cheol-Young Park; Eun Sook Lee; Yeong Sook Yoon; Eon Sook Lee; Sang Shin Park; Yuil Kim; Nak Jin Sung; Young Ho Yun; Keun Seok Lee; Han Sung Kang; Youngmee Kwon; Jungsil Ro
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Progranulin as a prognostic biomarker for breast cancer recurrence in patients who had hormone receptor-positive tumors: a cohort study.

Authors:  Dong Hoe Koo; Cheol-Young Park; Eun Sook Lee; Jungsil Ro; Sang Woo Oh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Proposed new clinicopathological surrogate definitions of luminal A and luminal B (HER2-negative) intrinsic breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Patrick Maisonneuve; Davide Disalvatore; Nicole Rotmensz; Giuseppe Curigliano; Marco Colleoni; Silvia Dellapasqua; Giancarlo Pruneri; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Alberto Luini; Fabio Bassi; Gianmatteo Pagani; Giuseppe Viale; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), human epidermal growth factor-2 and p53 in South Indian breast cancer patients: A tertiary care center experience.

Authors:  Rashmi Patnayak; Amitabh Jena; Nandyala Rukmangadha; Amit Kumar Chowhan; K Sambasivaiah; Bobbit Venkatesh Phaneendra; Mandyam Kumaraswamy Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

9.  SISH/CISH or qPCR as alternative techniques to FISH for determination of HER2 amplification status on breast tumors core needle biopsies: a multicenter experience based on 840 cases.

Authors:  Jocelyne Jacquemier; Frédérique Spyratos; Benjamin Esterni; Marie-Joëlle Mozziconacci; Martine Antoine; Laurent Arnould; Sarab Lizard; Philippe Bertheau; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; Cécile Blanc Fournier; Sophie Krieger; Frédéric Bibeau; Pierre-Jean Lamy; Marie Pierre Chenard; Michèle Legrain; Jean-Marc Guinebretière; Delphine Loussouarn; Gaëtan Macgrogan; Isabelle Hostein; Marie Christine Mathieu; Ludovic Lacroix; Alexander Valent; Yves Marie Robin; Françoise Revillion; Magali Lacroix Triki; Aline Seaume; Anne Vincent Salomon; Patricia de Cremoux; Geneviève Portefaix; Luc Xerri; Sophie Vacher; Ivan Bièche; Frédérique Penault-Llorca
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Study assessing the quality of quantification of estrogen receptor protein expression by immunohistochemistry and gene expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sas Leen; Van Laere Steven; Dierick Anne Marie; Duwel Valérie; De Pauw Annemie; Van Den Eynden Gert; Van Dam Peter; Dirix Luc; Vermeulen Peter; Lardon Filip
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2014-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.