Literature DB >> 19277645

Cortical scalloping and cortical penetration by small eccentric chondroid lesions in the long tubular bones: not a sign of malignancy?

Kimmie L Bui1, Hakan Ilaslan, Thomas W Bauer, Steven A Lietman, Michael J Joyce, Murali Sundaram.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate by cross-sectional imaging the prevalence and degree of cortical scalloping by small eccentric chondromas correlated with histologic diagnosis and patient history.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 122 patients with histologically proven enchondromas and two patients without histology but with radiologic and clinical follow-up, 11 patients with small, eccentrically located chondromas in the long bones had cross-sectional imaging available. The lesions were evaluated for location, size, presence, and degree of cortical scalloping. The patient's medical charts and microscope slides were reviewed for relevant clinical history, clinical management, and histology.
RESULTS: The chondromas ranged in size from 1.6 to 3.8 cm (mean 2.3 cm). Two lesions were located in the proximal femoral diaphysis, two in the distal femoral diaphysis, six in the distal femoral metaphysis, and one in the proximal tibial epimetaphysis. The lesions were curetted due to diagnostic uncertainty, continued pain, marked radiologic cortical penetration, or due to patient insistence on biopsy. All 11 lesions were benign, nine histologically, and two by stability over 4 and 7 years. The prevalence of cortical scalloping among eccentric chondromas was 100%. Cortical scalloping or occupancy ranged from 50 to 100% (mean 75%).
CONCLUSIONS: All small eccentric chondromas in this study were associated with an appearance of cortical scalloping of varying degree. All curetted lesions were histologically bland without nuclear atypia. Based on the benign histology of nine lesions and lack of growth of two lesions over several years, the degree of cortical scalloping is felt to be a result of lesion location within the endosteum rather than biological activity or malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19277645     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0675-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  8 in total

Review 1.  Benign and malignant cartilage tumors of bone and joint: their anatomic and theoretical basis with an emphasis on radiology, pathology and clinical biology. I. The intramedullary cartilage tumors.

Authors:  E W Brien; J M Mirra; R Kerr
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.

Authors:  D J Flemming; M D Murphey
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 3.  Enchondroma and chondrosarcoma of bone: clinical, radiologic, and histologic differentiation.

Authors:  Scott D Weiner
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

4.  Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula.

Authors:  Scott D Kendell; Mark S Collins; Mark C Adkins; Murali Sundaram; Krishnan K Unni
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Incidental enchondromas of the knee.

Authors:  Michael J Walden; Mark D Murphey; Jorge A Vidal
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.

Authors:  M D Murphey; D J Flemming; S R Boyea; J A Bojescul; D E Sweet; H T Temple
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Reliability of histopathologic and radiologic grading of cartilaginous neoplasms in long bones.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Periosteal chondroma. A clinicopathologic study of 23 cases.

Authors:  T W Bauer; H D Dorfman; J T Latham
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Enchondromas in children: imaging appearance with pathological correlation.

Authors:  Guillaume Bierry; Darcy A Kerr; G Petur Nielsen; Andrew E Rosenberg; Ambrose J Huang; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas?

Authors:  Hassan Douis; M Parry; S Vaiyapuri; A M Davies
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  The imaging of cartilaginous bone tumours. I. Benign lesions.

Authors:  H Douis; A Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Solitary bone lesions: which ones to worry about?

Authors:  Daniel Vanel; Eugenio Rimondi; Maia Vanel; Marco Gambarotti; Marco Alberghini
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.