Literature DB >> 21748390

Great Lakes fish consumption advisories: is mercury a concern?

Satyendra P Bhavsar1, Emily Awad, Chris G Mahon, Steve Petro.   

Abstract

The majority of the restrictive fish consumption advisories for the Canadian waters of the Great Lakes issued by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Canada based on the most restrictive contaminant, are attributed to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins/furans. Mercury currently causes about <1-2.5% and 9-16% of the restrictive advisories for the general population (GP) and sensitive population of children under 15 and women of child-bearing age (SP), respectively (the St. Lawrence River is not considered here). Toxaphene causes minor restrictions. At present it is not clear that if PCBs and dioxins/furans were to decrease below their fish consumption advisory guidelines, current fish mercury levels would replace some, most or all of the consumption restrictions. In order to examine this, location-, species- and size-specific fish consumption advisories were calculated for a "mercury only" scenario by disregarding the presence of the other contaminants. In the absence of other contaminants, mercury would replace some of the current advisories caused by other contaminants; however, the overall advisories would be minimally to moderately restrictive (<1-7% for GP; 13-32% for SP). Almost half of the Great Lake blocks considered here would have more than double the unrestricted consumption advisories than they currently have, with Lake Ontario showing the greatest improvement. Certain size ranges of each species across the main basins of the Canadian waters of the Great Lakes would be deemed safe for unrestricted consumption. However, at least some sizes of a number of species from certain locations of each lake would still have "do not eat" advisories issued for the SP, although these restrictions would be minimal for Lake Erie. These results suggest that the current mercury levels in the Canadian Great Lakes fish are of very minor concern for the GP and of moderate concern for the SP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21748390     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0731-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  11 in total

1.  Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes.

Authors:  Mark Cohen; Richard Artz; Roland Draxler; Paul Miller; Laurier Poissant; David Niemi; Dominique Ratté; Marc Deslauriers; Roch Duval; Rachelle Laurin; Jennifer Slotnick; Todd Nettesheim; John McDonald
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Assessing Canadian inventories to understand the environmental impacts of mercury releases to the Great Lakes region.

Authors:  Luke Trip; Tonya Bender; David Niemi
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Changes in mercury levels in Great Lakes fish between 1970s and 2007.

Authors:  Satyendra P Bhavsar; Sarah B Gewurtz; Daryl J McGoldrick; Michael J Keir; Sean M Backus
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Spatiotemporal trends of mercury in walleye and largemouth bass from the Laurentian Great Lakes region.

Authors:  Bruce A Monson; David F Staples; Satyendra P Bhavsar; Thomas M Holsen; Candy S Schrank; Sara K Moses; Daryl J McGoldrick; Sean M Backus; Kathryn A Williams
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 5.  The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Influence of fish size and sex on mercury/PCB concentration: importance for fish consumption advisories.

Authors:  Sarah B Gewurtz; Satyendra P Bhavsar; Rachael Fletcher
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 7.  Managing mercury in the great lakes: an analytical review of abatement policies.

Authors:  Satya P Mohapatra; Iana Nikolova; Anne Mitchell
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.789

8.  Ecological risk of methylmercury to piscivorous fish of the Great Lakes region.

Authors:  Mark B Sandheinrich; Satyendra P Bhavsar; R A Bodaly; Paul E Drevnick; Eric A Paul
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  An ecosystem approach to the health effects of mercury in the Great Lakes basin ecosystem.

Authors:  Michael Gilbertson; David O Carpenter
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Temporal trends and spatial distribution of dioxins and furans in lake trout or lake whitefish from the Canadian Great Lakes.

Authors:  Satyendra P Bhavsar; Emily Awad; Rachael Fletcher; Alan Hayton; Keith M Somers; Terry Kolic; Karen MacPherson; Eric J Reiner
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  6 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal trends of mercury in walleye and largemouth bass from the Laurentian Great Lakes region.

Authors:  Bruce A Monson; David F Staples; Satyendra P Bhavsar; Thomas M Holsen; Candy S Schrank; Sara K Moses; Daryl J McGoldrick; Sean M Backus; Kathryn A Williams
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Mercury in the Great Lakes region: bioaccumulation, spatiotemporal patterns, ecological risks, and policy.

Authors:  David C Evers; James G Wiener; Niladri Basu; R A Bodaly; Heather A Morrison; Kathryn A Williams
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Risks and benefits of consumption of Great Lakes fish.

Authors:  Mary E Turyk; Satyendra P Bhavsar; William Bowerman; Eric Boysen; Milton Clark; Miriam Diamond; Donna Mergler; Peter Pantazopoulos; Susan Schantz; David O Carpenter
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Evaluating the effectiveness of fish consumption advisories: modeling prenatal, postnatal, and childhood exposures to persistent organic pollutants.

Authors:  Matthew J Binnington; Cristina L Quinn; Michael S McLachlan; Frank Wania
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  The risk of mercury exposure to the people consuming fish from Lake Phewa, Nepal.

Authors:  Devna Singh Thapa; Chhatra Mani Sharma; Shichang Kang; Mika Sillanpää
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Are Fish Consumption Advisories for the Great Lakes Adequately Protective against Chemical Mixtures?

Authors:  Nilima Gandhi; Ken G Drouillard; George B Arhonditsis; Sarah B Gewurtz; Satyendra P Bhavsar
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.