Literature DB >> 15216863

Outpatient laparoscopic surgery: feasibility and consequences for education and health care costs.

J Skattum1, B Edwin, E Trondsen, O Mjåland, J Raede, T Buanes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this paper is to describe the outcome of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), antireflux surgery, adrenalectomy and splenectomy and possible implications for surgical education and health care costs.
METHODS: Prospective, observational study 1994-2003.
RESULTS: The success rate of ambulatory treatment was 83.5% in 1060 LC patients, 80% in 113 antireflux procedures, 100% in 22 laparoscopic adrenalectomies, and 75% in 12 laparoscopic splenectomies. In a total number of 1207 patients, health care costs were reduced by almost 700,000 dollars, compared to 1-day hospital stay. The educational potential of same-day surgery is large, due to high numbers of patients, and 80% of our educational potential has been exploited.
CONCLUSION: Ambulatory laparoscopic surgery is cost effective, patient friendly, and appropriate for surgical resident training. Strict organization of security rules is mandatory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15216863     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9180-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A J Voitk; S G Tsao; S Ignatius
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Practice distribution in procedural skills training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Mackay; P Morgan; V Datta; A Chang; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Is outpatient cholecystectomy safe for the higher-risk elective patient?

Authors:  A J Voitk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outpatient laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with Conn's syndrome.

Authors:  B Edwin; I Raeder; E Trondsen; R Kaaresen; T Buanes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what predicts the need for admission?

Authors:  J P Simpson; M T Savarise; J Moore
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible.

Authors:  J M Kiely; A E Brannigan; E Foley; S Cheema; W O'Brien; P V Delaney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  O Mjåland; J Raeder; V Aasboe; E Trondsen; T Buanes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Ambulatory and admitted laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients have comparable outcomes but different functional health status.

Authors:  R E Burney; K R Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Contemporary outcomes of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major teaching hospital.

Authors:  Hung Lau; David C Brooks
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-06-24       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Selection criteria for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) in patients with gallstone disease.

Authors:  E Trondsen; B Edwin; O Reiertsen; H Fagertun; A R Rosseland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  16 in total

1.  Oncological feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: a single-institution comparative study.

Authors:  S Rehman; S K P John; R Lochan; B C Jaques; D M Manas; R M Charnley; J J French; S A White
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Ambulatory laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: outpatient procedure versus overnight stay.

Authors:  D K Wasowicz-Kemps; B Bliemer; F A Boom; N M de Zwaan; B van Ramshorst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with high BMI: Experience from a UK centre.

Authors:  A Tandon; G Sunderland; Q M Nunes; N Misra; M Shrotri
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for selected patients?

Authors:  M Victorzon; P Tolonen; T Vuorialho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: clinical pathway implementation is efficient and cost effective and increases hospital bed capacity.

Authors:  B Topal; G Peeters; A Verbert; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Safety and effectiveness of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital: a prospective study of 110 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Athanasios Marinis; Emmanouil Stamatakis; Athanasia Tsaroucha; Nikolaos Dafnios; Georgios Anastasopoulos; Georgios Polymeneas; Theodosios Theodosopoulos
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-07-22

8.  An audit of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a Singapore institution: are we ready for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Alfred Wei Chieh Kow; Amanda Tan; Siew Pang Chan; Sow Fong Lee; Chung Yip Chan; Kui Hin Liau; Choon Kiat Ho
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Prospective study of routine day-case laparoscopic modified Lind partial fundoplication.

Authors:  S Agrawal; I Shapey; A Peacock; A Ali; P Super
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N Z Ahmad; G Byrnes; S A Naqvi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.