Literature DB >> 12209240

Contemporary outcomes of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major teaching hospital.

Hung Lau1, David C Brooks.   

Abstract

Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an established practice in our institution, with an experience of more than 800 cases. The present study is conducted to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the setting of a major teaching hospital. A retrospective analysis of 200 patients who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomies was performed to evaluate the postoperative morbidity, unplanned admission, and readmission rates. Causes for unanticipated admission and readmission were analyzed. Uneventful recovery was attained in 185 (92.5%) patients. The mean length of the operation was 56 +/- 20 (SD) minutes. There was no hospital mortality, and no patient required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Nine patients were admitted overnight after operation because of nausea and vomiting (n = 3), pain (n = 2), urinary retention (n = 2), medical observation n = 1), and patient's preference (n = 1), leading to an unanticipated admission rate of 4.5%. Six patients required readmission because of postoperative complications (n = 4) and abdominal pain (n = 2), giving a readmission rate of 3%. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 3% (n = 6), including retained stones n = 4), bile leakage (n = 1), and hepatic subcapsular hematoma (n = 1). Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe practice in appropriately selected patients. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was the commonest reason for unanticipated admission after operation, and retained stones was the most frequent postoperative morbidity necessitating readmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12209240     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6264-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Improved outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection: a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Yucel Cengiz; Jan Dalenbäck; Gunnar Edlund; Leif A Israelsson; Arthur Jänes; Mats Möller; Anders Thorell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cost analysis comparing ultrasonic fundus-first and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy using electrocautery.

Authors:  Fredrik Tempé; Arthur Jänes; Yucel Cengiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Low ninety-day re-admission rates after emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Sue K Down; Marko Nicolic; Hibba Abdulkarim; Nick Skelton; Adrian H Harris; Yashwant Koak
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a feasibility study in a public health service hospital in a developing country.

Authors:  A Chauhan; M Mehrotra; P K Bhatia; B Baj; A K Gupta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for selected patients?

Authors:  M Victorzon; P Tolonen; T Vuorialho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Daycase laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of post-discharge pain, analgesic and antiemetic requirements.

Authors:  T Kavanagh; P Hu; S Minogue
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  An audit of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a Singapore institution: are we ready for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Alfred Wei Chieh Kow; Amanda Tan; Siew Pang Chan; Sow Fong Lee; Chung Yip Chan; Kui Hin Liau; Choon Kiat Ho
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  [Laparoscopy: potential and limitations in outpatient and short-term inpatient surgery].

Authors:  H Feussner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N Z Ahmad; G Byrnes; S A Naqvi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Athar Ali; Tabish Chawla; Abid Jamal
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.