Literature DB >> 15216547

Medical privacy and the disclosure of personal medical information: the beliefs and experiences of those with genetic and other clinical conditions.

Nancy E Kass1, Sara Chandros Hull, Marvin R Natowicz, Ruth R Faden, Laura Plantinga, Lawrence O Gostin, Julia Slutsman.   

Abstract

There has been heightened legislative attention to medical privacy and to protections from genetic discrimination, without large-scale studies to document privacy concerns or analysis of whether experiences differ by whether the condition is genetic (defined here as a single-gene disorder) or non-genetic. To determine whether experiences regarding privacy, disclosure, and consequences of disclosure differ by whether one's medical condition is genetic, we conducted a descriptive study with one-time, structured quantitative and qualitative interviews. We interviewed approximately 100 adults or parents of children with each of the following medical conditions: sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, and HIV, and 200 adults with or at risk for breast cancer or colon cancer. The percentages of the total 597 respondents experiencing positive or negative consequences of disclosure and the degree to which experiences differed by whether the condition was genetic were the outcomes of interest. Seventy-four percent were glad and 13% regretted others knew about their condition; these findings did not differ significantly by genetic vs. non-genetic condition. Reports of job and health insurance discrimination were not uncommon for the overall study population (19 and 27%, respectively) but were more likely among those with genetic conditions (30 and 37%, respectively). Legislation and other policy-making should target the needs of persons with all conditions and not focus exclusively on genetic discrimination, given that experiences and concerns generally do not differ based on the genetic etiology of the condition. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15216547      PMCID: PMC4819325          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  20 in total

1.  Health information privacy.

Authors:  Lawrence O Gostin
Journal:  Cornell Law Rev       Date:  1995-03

2.  Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: a case study analysis.

Authors:  Lisa N Geller; Joseph S Alper; Paul R Billings; Carol I Barash; Jonathan Beckwith; Marvin R Natowicz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism.

Authors:  L O Gostin; J G Hodge
Journal:  Jurimetrics       Date:  1999

4.  Genetic discrimination and the law.

Authors:  M R Natowicz; J K Alper; J S Alper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Genetic discrimination in life insurance: empirical evidence from a cross sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  L Low; S King; T Wilkie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-12

6.  The public health information infrastructure. A national review of the law on health information privacy.

Authors:  L O Gostin; Z Lazzarini; V S Neslund; M T Osterholm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  The AIDS litigation project. A national review of court and human rights commission decisions, Part II: Discrimination.

Authors:  L O Gostin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  What would you do? Specialists' perspectives on cancer genetic testing, prophylactic surgery, and insurance discrimination.

Authors:  E T Matloff; H Shappell; K Brierley; B A Bernhardt; W McKinnon; B N Peshkin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  National health information privacy: regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

Authors:  L O Gostin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Stigmatization of AIDS patients by physicians.

Authors:  J A Kelly; J S St Lawrence; S Smith; H V Hood; D J Cook
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  11 in total

1.  Parents' perceptions of functioning in families having a child with a genetic condition.

Authors:  Kathleen A Knafl; George J Knafl; Agatha M Gallo; Denise Angst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Civilian and military genetics: nondiscrimination policy in a post-GINA world.

Authors:  Susannah Baruch; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Ethics and policy issues for stem cell research and pulmonary medicine.

Authors:  Justin Lowenthal; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Joint replacement recipients' views about health information privacy.

Authors:  Amanda L Terry; Bert M Chesworth; Robert B Bourne; Paul Stolee; Mark Speechley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Managing the need to tell: Triggers and strategic disclosure of thalassemia major in Singapore.

Authors:  Neha Kumar; Erin Turbitt; Barbara B Biesecker; Ilana M Miller; Breana Cham; Katherine C Smith; Rajiv N Rimal
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  "The cancer bond": exploring the formation of cancer risk perception in families with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Aunchalee E L Palmquist; Laura M Koehly; Susan K Peterson; Margarette Shegog; Sally W Vernon; Ellen R Gritz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Patient perspectives on group benefits and harms in genetic research.

Authors:  A J Goldenberg; S C Hull; B S Wilfond; R R Sharp
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Colorectal cancer cases and relatives of cases indicate similar willingness to receive and disclose genetic information.

Authors:  Rachel M Ceballos; Polly A Newcomb; Jeannette M Beasley; Scot Peterson; Allyson Templeton; Julie R Hunt
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2008-09

10.  Adult sickle cell quality-of-life measurement information system (ASCQ-Me): conceptual model based on review of the literature and formative research.

Authors:  Marsha J Treadwell; Kathryn Hassell; Roger Levine; San Keller
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.