Literature DB >> 8648874

The public health information infrastructure. A national review of the law on health information privacy.

L O Gostin1, Z Lazzarini, V S Neslund, M T Osterholm.   

Abstract

Our objectives were to review and analyze the laws in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico that regulate the acquisition, storage, and use of public health data and to offer proposals for reform of the laws on public health information privacy. Virtually all states reported some statutory protection for governmentally maintained health data for public health information in general (49 states), communicable diseases (42 states), and sexually transmitted diseases (43 states). State statutes permitted disclosure of data for statistical purposes (42 states), contact tracing (39 states), epidemiologic investigations (22 states), and subpoena or court order (14 states). The survey revealed significant problems that affect both the development of fair and effective public health information systems and the protection of privacy. Statutes may be silent about the degree of privacy protection afforded, confer weaker privacy protection to certain kinds of information, or grant health officials broad discretion to disseminate personal information. Our proposals for law reform are based on a meeting of experts at the Carter Presidential Center under the auspices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists: (1) an independent data protection commission should be established, (2) health authorities should justify the collection of personally identifiable information, (3) subjects should be given basic information about data practices, (4) data should be held and used in accordance with fair information practices, (5) legally binding privacy and security assurances should attach to identifiable health information with significant penalties for breach of these assurances, (6) disclosure of data should be made only for purposes consistent with the original collection, and (7) secondary uses beyond those originally intended by the data collector should be permitted only with informed consent.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8648874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  16 in total

1.  Relationships between in-hospital and 30-day standardized hospital mortality: implications for profiling hospitals.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal; D W Baker; D G Norris; L E Way; D L Harper; R J Snow
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Informational privacy and the public's health: the Model State Public Health Privacy Act.

Authors:  L O Gostin; J G Hodge; R O Valdiserri
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Evaluation of vocabularies for electronic laboratory reporting to public health agencies.

Authors:  M D White; L M Kolar; S J Steindel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Making the case for laws that improve health: a framework for public health law research.

Authors:  Scott Burris; Alexander C Wagenaar; Jeffrey Swanson; Jennifer K Ibrahim; Jennifer Wood; Michelle M Mello
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 5.  Strategies and methods for aligning current and best medical practices. The role of information technologies.

Authors:  E C Schneider; J M Eisenberg
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-05

Review 6.  Serious technology assessment for health care information technology.

Authors:  R Cushman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  An education in contrast: state-by-state assessment of school immunization records requirements.

Authors:  Erika M Hedden; Amy B Jessop; Robert I Field
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology.

Authors:  D W Bates; M Cohen; L L Leape; J M Overhage; M M Shabot; T Sheridan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Multicenter patient records research: security policies and tools.

Authors:  F M Behlen; S B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Medical privacy and the disclosure of personal medical information: the beliefs and experiences of those with genetic and other clinical conditions.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Sara Chandros Hull; Marvin R Natowicz; Ruth R Faden; Laura Plantinga; Lawrence O Gostin; Julia Slutsman
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.