Literature DB >> 1342778

Genetic discrimination and the law.

M R Natowicz1, J K Alper, J S Alper.   

Abstract

The use of genetic tests can lead to genetic discrimination, discrimination based solely on the nature of an individual's genotype. Instances of the discriminatory uses of genetic tests by employers and insurance companies have already been reported. The recently enacted Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), together with other federal and state laws, can be used to combat some forms of this discrimination. In this article we define and characterize genetic discrimination, discuss the applicability of the various relevant federal and state laws, including the ADA, in the areas of employment and insurance discrimination, explore the limitations of these laws, and, finally, suggest some means of overcoming these limitations.

Keywords:  Americans with Disabilities Act 1990; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach; Rehabilitation Act 1973

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1342778      PMCID: PMC1684277     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  9 in total

1.  Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing.

Authors:  P R Billings; M A Kohn; M de Cuevas; J Beckwith; J S Alper; M R Natowicz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  The advent of DNA databanks: implications for information privacy.

Authors:  A de Gorgey
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1990

3.  Genetic discrimination: the use of genetically based diagnostic and prognostic tests by employers and insurers.

Authors:  L Gostin
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1991

Review 4.  Confidentiality of genetic information in the workplace.

Authors:  L B Andrews; A S Jaeger
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1991

5.  Health, equity, and reproductive risks in the workplace.

Authors:  C R Daniels; M Paul; R Rosofsky
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.222

6.  Genetic testing and exclusionary practices in the workplace.

Authors:  L Uzych
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.222

7.  Sickle-cell trait as a risk factor for sudden death in physical training.

Authors:  J A Kark; D M Posey; H R Schumacher; C J Ruehle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-09-24       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Genetic screening: marvel or menace?

Authors:  P T Rowley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Diagnosis of genetic disorders at the DNA level.

Authors:  S E Antonarakis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-19       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  20 in total

1.  Reply to Hook and Lowden: the definition and implications of genetic discrimination.

Authors:  Paul R Billings; Joseph S Alper; Jon Beckwith; Carol I Barash; Marvin R Natowicz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Reply to Hook: genetic discrimination and public safety.

Authors:  Marvin R Natowicz; Jane K Alper; Joseph S Alper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The twisted helix: an essay on genetic counselors, eugenics, and social responsibility.

Authors:  Robert G Resta
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: a case study analysis.

Authors:  Lisa N Geller; Joseph S Alper; Paul R Billings; Carol I Barash; Jonathan Beckwith; Marvin R Natowicz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Geneticists' responsibility to other health care professionals and to the lay public.

Authors:  K L Garver; K LeChien
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genetic discrimination and insurance underwriting.

Authors:  J A Lowden
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Genetic discrimination and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Authors:  M R Natowicz; J K Alper; J S Alper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Genetic distinctions are not necessarily examples of genetic discrimination.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Eugenics and genetic discrimination.

Authors:  N A Holtzman; M A Rothstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Discrimination as a consequence of genetic testing.

Authors:  P R Billings; M A Kohn; M de Cuevas; J Beckwith; J S Alper; M R Natowicz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.