Literature DB >> 15211102

Competition in medical services and the quality of care: concepts and history.

Mark V Pauly1.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the concept of optimal quality in medical care from an economic viewpoint. It also provides some data on recent trends in competition in the health care sector. Economically optimal quality reflects a tradeoff of marginal benefits against (minimized) marginal cost. Actual quality may be suboptimal either because of technical inefficiency in the production of quality or because consumers fail to make proper choices. In concept, competition, if supplemented by adequate information, can help. Overall competition in the hospital industry has declined modestly in recent years, but competition in markets for more generously reimbursed specific services, such as coronary artery bypass grafting, has increased.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15211102     DOI: 10.1023/B:IHFE.0000032419.89581.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ        ISSN: 1389-6563


  10 in total

1.  The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis.

Authors:  Sheila Leatherman; Donald Berwick; Debra Iles; Lawrence S Lewin; Frank Davidoff; Thomas Nolan; Maureen Bisognano
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Technological development and medical productivity: the diffusion of angioplasty in New York state.

Authors:  David M Cutler; Robert S Huckman
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine S Panageas; Deborah Schrag; Elyn Riedel; Peter B Bach; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Do HMOs have monopsony power?

Authors:  R Feldman; D Wholey
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2001-03

5.  Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Rushika Fernandopulle; HyunSook Ryu Song; Bruce Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Managed care, market power, and monopsony.

Authors:  M V Pauly
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care?

Authors:  R H Miller; H S Luft
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; Laura P Coombs; Elizabeth R DeLong; Constance K Haan; T Bruce Ferguson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Indirect vs direct hospital quality indicators for very low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  Jeannette A Rogowski; Jeffrey D Horbar; Douglas O Staiger; Michael Kenny; Joseph Carpenter; Jeffrey Geppert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Competition and efficiency in the end stage renal disease program.

Authors:  P J Held; M V Pauly
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.883

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Nonprice competition and quality of care in managed care: the New York SCHIP market.

Authors:  Hangsheng Liu; Charles E Phelps
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Patient selection in the presence of regulatory oversight based on healthcare report cards of providers: the case of organ transplantation.

Authors:  Mariétou H Ouayogodé; Kurt E Schnier
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2021-01-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.