Literature DB >> 10263967

Competition and efficiency in the end stage renal disease program.

P J Held, M V Pauly.   

Abstract

Estimated coefficients for medical service production or cost functions are subject to a 'competitive amenity bias' which may result in the failure to identify factors that affect economic efficiency. Our investigation of productivity of dialysis facilities did indeed indicate both the likelihood of bias and some qualitative results. These results suggest that it will be difficult to estimate cost and that variation in the level of reimbursement will, in competitive markets, affect the level of amenity delivered to patients. Incurred cost, amenity, and patient well-being will all vary positively with the reimbursement level. Determining the 'right' level of reimbursement requires a policy decision on how much total amenity society wishes to deliver to beneficiaries of public programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 10263967     DOI: 10.1016/0167-6296(83)90001-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  21 in total

1.  A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: an examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs.

Authors:  Hacer Ozgen; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Competition in medical services and the quality of care: concepts and history.

Authors:  Mark V Pauly
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-06

3.  Separating managerial inefficiency from influences of the operating environment: an application in dialysis.

Authors:  Nick Kontodimopoulos; Nikolaos D Papathanasiou; Yannis Tountas; Dimitris Niakas
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Longitudinal analysis of efficiency in multiple output dialysis markets.

Authors:  Hacer Ozgen; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-11

5.  The effects of price competition and reduced subsidies for uncompensated care on hospital mortality.

Authors:  Kevin G M Volpp; Jonathan D Ketcham; Andrew J Epstein; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week.

Authors:  Glenn M Chertow; Nathan W Levin; Gerald J Beck; Thomas A Depner; Paul W Eggers; Jennifer J Gassman; Irina Gorodetskaya; Tom Greene; Sam James; Brett Larive; Robert M Lindsay; Ravindra L Mehta; Brent Miller; Daniel B Ornt; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Anjay Rastogi; Michael V Rocco; Brigitte Schiller; Olga Sergeyeva; Gerald Schulman; George O Ting; Mark L Unruh; Robert A Star; Alan S Kliger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Predictors of chain acquisition among independent dialysis facilities.

Authors:  Alyssa S Pozniak; Richard A Hirth; Jane Banaszak-Holl; John R C Wheeler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  For-profit status and industry evolution in health care markets: evidence from the dialysis industry.

Authors:  Nathan E Wilson
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2016-07-14

9.  The production of dialysis by for-profit versus not-for-profit freestanding renal dialysis facilities.

Authors:  R I Griffiths; N R Powe; D J Gaskin; G F Anderson; G V de Lissovoy; P K Whelton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Market reform in New Jersey and the effect on mortality from acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kevin G M Volpp; Sankey V Williams; Joel Waldfogel; Jeffrey H Silber; J Sanford Schwartz; Mark V Pauly
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.