Literature DB >> 15209104

Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles.

Sarah P Otto1.   

Abstract

Pleiotropy is one of the most commonly observed attributes of genes. Yet the extent and influence of pleiotropy have been underexplored in population genetics models. In this paper, I quantify the extent to which pleiotropy inhibits the spread of alleles in response to directional selection on a focal trait. Under the assumption that pleiotropic effects are extensive and deleterious, the fraction of alleles that are beneficial overall is severely limited by pleiotropy and rises nearly linearly with the strength of directional selection on the focal trait. Over a broad class of distribution of pleiotropic effects, the mean selective effect of those alleles that are beneficial overall is halved, on average, by pleiotropy. The fraction of new mutant alleles that are beneficial overall and that succeed in fixing within a population is even more severely limited when directional selection is weak, but it rises quadratically with the strength of directional selection. Finally, the mean selective effect of mutant alleles that are beneficial and succeed in fixing is reduced by one-third, on average, by pleiotropy. These results help to shape our understanding of the evolutionary inertia caused by pleiotropy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15209104      PMCID: PMC1691650          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait.

Authors:  S P Otto; C D Jones
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Pleiotropic model of maintenance of quantitative genetic variation at mutation-selection balance.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; Jinliang Wang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The genetics of adaptation: the roles of pleiotropy, stabilizing selection and drift in shaping the distribution of bidirectional fixed mutational effects.

Authors:  Cortland K Griswold; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T F Mackay; R F Lyman; M S Jackson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The maintenance of the genetic variability of polygenic characters by heterozygous advantage.

Authors:  M G Bulmer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Linkage and the limits to natural selection.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Pleiotropic overdominance and the maintenance of genetic variation in polygenic characters.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  77 in total

1.  Biomechanical trade-offs bias rates of evolution in the feeding apparatus of fishes.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; David C Collar; Samantha A Price; C Darrin Hulsey; Robert C Thomson; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Perspectives on the genetic architecture of divergence in body shape in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Duncan T Reid; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Darko Cotoras; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Characterization and precise mapping of a QTL increasing spike number with pleiotropic effects in wheat.

Authors:  Shimin Deng; Xinru Wu; Yuye Wu; Ronghua Zhou; Honggang Wang; Jizeng Jia; Shubing Liu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genomic patterns of pleiotropy and the evolution of complexity.

Authors:  Zhi Wang; Ben-Yang Liao; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Synergistic Pleiotropy Overrides the Costs of Complexity in Viral Adaptation.

Authors:  Lindsey W McGee; Andrew M Sackman; Anneliese J Morrison; Jessica Pierce; Jeremy Anisman; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits.

Authors:  Toby Johnson; Nick Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Structural constraints and mutational bias in the evolutionary restoration of a severe deletion in RNA phage MS2.

Authors:  Normunds Licis; Jan van Duin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Evolutionary framework for protein sequence evolution and gene pleiotropy.

Authors:  Xun Gu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.