Literature DB >> 20438282

Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).

Maria O Celaya1, Ethan M Berke, Tracy L Onega, Jiang Gui, Bruce L Riddle, Sai S Cherala, Judy R Rees.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Early detection of breast cancer by screening mammography aims to increase treatment options and decrease mortality. Recent studies have shown inconsistent results in their investigations of the possible association between travel distance to mammography and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate whether geographic access to mammography screening is associated with the stage at breast cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: Using the state's population-based cancer registry, all female residents of New Hampshire aged > or =40 years who were diagnosed with breast cancer during 1998-2004 were identified. The factors associated with early stage (stages 0 to 2) or later stage (stages 3 and 4) diagnosis of breast cancer were compared, with emphasis on the distance a woman lived from the closest mammography screening facility, and residence in rural and urban locations.
RESULTS: A total of 5966 New Hampshire women were diagnosed with breast cancer during 1998-2004. Their mean driving distance to the nearest mammography facility was 8.85 km (range 0-44.26; 5.5 miles, range 0-27.5), with a mean estimated travel time of 8.9 min (range 0.0-42.2). The distribution of travel distance (and travel time) was substantially skewed to the right: 56% of patients lived within 8 km (5 miles) of a mammography facility, and 65% had a travel time of less than 10 min. There was no significant association between later stage of breast cancer and travel time to the nearest mammography facility. Using 3 categories of rural/urban residence based on Rural Urban Commuting Area classification, no significant association between rural residence and stage of diagnosis was found. New Hampshire women were more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer at later stages if they lacked private health insurance (p<0.001), were not married (p<0.001), were older (p<0.001), and there was a borderline association with diagnosis during non-winter months (p=0.074).
CONCLUSIONS: Most women living in New Hampshire have good geographical access to mammography, and no indication was found that travel time or travel distance to mammography significantly affected stage at breast cancer diagnosis. Health insurance, age and marital status were the major factors associated with later stage breast cancer. The study contributes to an ongoing debate over geographic access to screening mammography in different states, which have given contradictory results. These inconsistencies in the rural health literature highlight a need to understand the complexity of defining rural and urban residence; to characterize more precisely the issues that contribute to good preventive care in different rural communities; and to appreciate the efforts already made in some rural states to provide good geographic access to preventive care. In New Hampshire, specific subgroups such as the uninsured and the elderly remain at greatest risk of being diagnosed with later stage breast cancer and may benefit from targeted interventions to improve early detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438282      PMCID: PMC5585775     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rural Remote Health        ISSN: 1445-6354            Impact factor:   1.759


  38 in total

1.  Prevalence and correlates of repeat mammography among women aged 55-79 in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  William Rakowski; Nancy Breen; Helen Meissner; Barbara K Rimer; Sally W Vernon; Melissa A Clark; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Cancer of the colorectum in Maine, 1995-1998: determinants of stage at diagnosis in a rural state.

Authors:  Margaret A Parsons; Kathleen D Askland
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Effects of health insurance and race on early detection of cancer.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; N Pal; C Tennant; L Voti; J Z Ayanian; A Schwabe; J P Krischer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Colorectal cancer stage at diagnosis by socioeconomic and urban/rural status in California, 1988-2000.

Authors:  Arti Parikh-Patel; Janet H Bates; Sharan Campleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Absence of cancer diagnosis and treatment in elderly Medicaid-insured nursing home residents.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; Jan P Clement; Chunchieh Lin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Rural versus urban colorectal and lung cancer patients: differences in stage at presentation.

Authors:  Ian Paquette; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  California Medicaid enrollment and melanoma stage at diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Ricardo A Pollitt; Christina A Clarke; Sarah J Shema; Susan M Swetter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Rural-urban differences in stage at diagnosis. Possible relationship to cancer screening.

Authors:  J M Liff; W H Chow; R S Greenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Access to cancer services for rural colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Yong Cai; Eric H Larson; Sharon A Dobie; George E Wright; David C Goodman; Barbara Matthews; L Gary Hart
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Rural and urban differences in stage at diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancers.

Authors:  N C Campbell; A M Elliott; L Sharp; L D Ritchie; J Cassidy; J Little
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Geographic Access to Mammography and Its Relationship to Breast Cancer Screening and Stage at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jenna A Khan-Gates; Jennifer L Ersek; Jan M Eberth; Swann A Adams; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-07-26

2.  Racial and socio-economic disparities in breast cancer hospitalization outcomes by insurance status.

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; Swati Sakhuja; Neomi Vin-Raviv
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Health related lifestyle and preventive medical care of rural Spanish women compared to their urban counterparts.

Authors:  Ernesto De la Cruz-Sánchez; Loli Aguirre-Gómez
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-08

4.  Stage at breast cancer diagnosis and distance from diagnostic hospital in a periurban setting: a South African public hospital case series of over 1,000 women.

Authors:  Caroline Dickens; Maureen Joffe; Judith Jacobson; Francois Venter; Joachim Schüz; Herbert Cubasch; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Disparity in Breast Cancer Late Stage at Diagnosis in Missouri: Does Rural Versus Urban Residence Matter?

Authors:  Faustine Williams; Emmanuel Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-06-20

6.  Rural-Urban Residence and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis Among Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Molly E Roseland; Michele L Cote; Amy Lehman; Eric A Whitsel; Faheemah N Mustafaa; Jason Booza; Michael S Simon
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Distance as a Barrier to Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Massimo Ambroggi; Claudia Biasini; Cinzia Del Giovane; Fabio Fornari; Luigi Cavanna
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-10-28

8.  Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening.

Authors:  Patricia I Jewett; Ronald E Gangnon; Elena Elkin; John M Hampton; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Kristen Malecki; James LaGro; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Sociodemographic Characteristics, Distance to the Clinic, and Breast Cancer Screening Results.

Authors:  Seijeoung Kim; Beverly Chukwudozie; Elizabeth Calhoun
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2013

10.  Rural-urban differences in health behaviors and implications for health status among US cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathryn E Weaver; Nynikka Palmer; Lingyi Lu; L Douglas Case; Ann M Geiger
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.