Literature DB >> 3186757

Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain.

T Yamamoto1, S J Williamson, L Kaufman, C Nicholson, R Llinás.   

Abstract

The performance of a cryogenic system that monitors the extracranial magnetic field simultaneously at 14 positions over the scalp has been evaluated to determine the accuracy with which neuronal activity can be located within the human brain. Initially, measurements were implemented on two model systems, a lucite sphere filled with saline and a model skull. With a magnetic field strength similar to that of a human brain, the measurement and analysis procedures demonstrated a position accuracy better than 3 mm, for a current dipole 3 cm beneath the surface. Subsequently, measurements of the magnetic field pattern appearing 100 ms after the onset of an auditory tone-burst stimulus were obtained in three human subjects. The location of the current dipole representing intracellular ionic current in active neurons of the brain was determined, with 3-mm accuracy, to be within the cortex forming the floor of the Sylvian fissure of the individual subjects, corresponding closely to the Heschl gyrus as determined from magnetic resonance images. With the sensors placed at appropriate positions, the locations of neuronal sources for different tone frequencies could be obtained without moving the recording instrument. Adaptation of activity in human auditory cortex was shown to reveal long-term features with a paradigm that compared response amplitudes for three tones randomly presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3186757      PMCID: PMC282535          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium.

Authors:  D S Barth; W Sutherling; J Broffman; J Beatty
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-03

2.  Cerebral neuromagnetic responses evoked by short auditory stimuli.

Authors:  M Sams; M Hämäläinen; A Antervo; E Kaukoranta; K Reinikainen; R Hari
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-10

Review 3.  SQUID arrays for simultaneous magnetic measurements: calibration and source localization performance.

Authors:  P Costa Ribeiro; S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp.

Authors:  H G Vaughan; W Ritter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-04

5.  A four-channel SQUID magnetometer for brain research.

Authors:  R Ilmoniemi; R Hari; K Reinikainen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-11

6.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  G L Romani; S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Localization of neural generators.

Authors:  R Hari; K Aittoniemi; M L Järvinen; T Katila; T Varpula
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Characterization of the human auditory cortex by the neuromagnetic method.

Authors:  G L Romani; S J Williamson; L Kaufman; D Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neuromagnetic evidence of spatially distributed sources underlying epileptiform spikes in the human brain.

Authors:  D S Barth; W Sutherling; J Engle; J Beatty
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-01-20       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Magnetic auditory responses from the human brain. A preliminary report.

Authors:  C Elberling; C Bak; B Kofoed; J Lebech; K Saermark
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1980
View more
  32 in total

1.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Authors:  Arthur K Liu; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Authors:  Carrie J Scarff; Joseph C Dort; Jos J Eggermont; Bradley G Goodyear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Simultaneous EEG and MEG source reconstruction in sparse electromagnetic source imaging.

Authors:  Lei Ding; Han Yuan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Spatial extent of coherent sensory-evoked cortical activity.

Authors:  Z L Lü; S J Williamson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Intersession replicability of dipole parameters from three components of the auditory evoked magnetic field.

Authors:  S B Baumann; R L Rogers; A C Papanicolaou; C L Saydjari
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  Evolution of neuromagnetic topographic mapping.

Authors:  S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Advances in neuromagnetic instrumentation and studies of spontaneous brain activity.

Authors:  S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Tao Song; Donald J Hagler; Igor Podgorny; Veikko Jousmaki; Li Cui; Kathleen Gaa; Deborah L Harrington; Anders M Dale; Roland R Lee; Jeff Elman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Accurate matching of electromagnetic dipole data with CT and MR images.

Authors:  P A van den Elsen; M A Viergever; A C van Huffelen; W van der Meij; G H Wieneke
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 10.  EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.