Literature DB >> 15190698

Using logistic regression to estimate delay-discounting functions.

E Paul Wileyto1, Janet Audrain-McGovern, Leonard H Epstein, Caryn Lerman.   

Abstract

The monetary choice questionnaire (MCQ) and similar computer tasks ask preference questions in order to ascertain indifference, the perceived equivalence of immediate versus larger delayed rewards. Indifference data are then fitted with a hyperbolic function, summarizing the decline in perceived value with delay time. We present a fitting method that estimates the hyperbolic parameter k directly from survey responses. Binary preferences are modeled as a function of time (X2) and a transformed reward ratio (X1), yielding logistic regression coefficients beta 2 and beta 1. The hyperbolic parameter emerges as k = beta 2/beta 1, where the logistic predicted p = .5 (the definition of indifference). The MCQ was administered to 1,073 adolescents and was scored using both standard and logistic methods. The means for In(k) were similar (standard, -4.53; logistic, -4.51), and the results were highly correlated (rho = .973). Simulated MCQ data showed that k was unbiased, except where beta 1 > or = -1, indicating a vague survey response. Jackknife standard errors provided excellent coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15190698     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  22 in total

1.  Neural and behavioral mechanisms of impulsive choice in alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Eric D Claus; Kent A Kiehl; Kent E Hutchison
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Resurrecting the individual in behavioral analysis: Using mixed effects models to address nonsystematic discounting data.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Catherine C Steele; Jennifer R Peterson
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2018-06-18

3.  Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks.

Authors:  Catherine C Steele; Jennifer R Peterson; Andrew T Marshall; Sarah L Stuebing; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Analytical methods to detect within-individual changes in discounting.

Authors:  Reid D Landes; Jeffery A Pitcock; Richard Yi; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Discounting of delayed rewards: (A)theoretical interpretation of the Kirby questionnaire.

Authors:  Joel Myerson; Ana A Baumann; Leonard Green
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Got chocolate? Bilateral prefrontal cortex stimulation augments chocolate consumption.

Authors:  Chan To; Mary Falcone; James Loughead; Erin Logue-Chamberlain; Roy Hamilton; Joseph Kable; Caryn Lerman; Rebecca L Ashare
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Durability and generalizability of time-based intervention effects on impulsive choice in rats.

Authors:  Carrie Bailey; Jennifer R Peterson; Aaron Schnegelsiepen; Sarah L Stuebing; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Exploring Relationships Among Experience of Regret, Delay Discounting, and Worries About Future Effects of Smoking Among Current Smokers.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; James F Thrasher; Maansi Bansal-Travers
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 9.  Clinical models of decision making in addiction.

Authors:  Mikhail N Koffarnus; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Effects of benztropine analogs on delay discounting in rats.

Authors:  Paul L Soto; Takato Hiranita
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.