Richard J O'Connor1, James F Thrasher2, Maansi Bansal-Travers1. 1. a Department of Health Behavior , Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo , New York , USA. 2. b Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior , University of South Carolina , Columbia , South Carolina , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smoking regret differs by smoker characteristics (dependence) and may be linked to delay discounting (DD), where smaller immediate rewards are preferred to larger delayed rewards. It is hypothesized that those who exhibit stronger tendencies to delay rewards also express fewer future health concerns and possibly less regret about smoking. OBJECTIVES: The objective is to determine the interrelationships of regret, dependence, and delay discounting among current smokers. METHODS: In July 2010, 1062 smokers completed a 45-minute at-home web based survey and answered questions including regret, dependence (Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence), and delay discounting (Monetary Choice Questionnaire). Relationships among these variables and perceived future health effects were analyzed using correlations, repeated measures analysis of variance, and generalized linear models. RESULTS: Most smokers (85%) regretted smoking. FTCD and log-k (DD) scores were positively associated (rs = 0.15, p < .001). Though a strong decline in log-k was shown as reward increased (p's < .001), there were no differences in discounting by regret. Regret was positively associated with worries concerning health effects, quality of life, and finances (p's < .001). Little association was found between DD and future health concerns. CONCLUSIONS/IMPORTANCE: Though this study confirms that regret for smoking is associated with perceived future risks as well as supports previous findings between FTCD and DD, it shows little association between DD and perceived future risks.
BACKGROUND: Smoking regret differs by smoker characteristics (dependence) and may be linked to delay discounting (DD), where smaller immediate rewards are preferred to larger delayed rewards. It is hypothesized that those who exhibit stronger tendencies to delay rewards also express fewer future health concerns and possibly less regret about smoking. OBJECTIVES: The objective is to determine the interrelationships of regret, dependence, and delay discounting among current smokers. METHODS: In July 2010, 1062 smokers completed a 45-minute at-home web based survey and answered questions including regret, dependence (Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence), and delay discounting (Monetary Choice Questionnaire). Relationships among these variables and perceived future health effects were analyzed using correlations, repeated measures analysis of variance, and generalized linear models. RESULTS: Most smokers (85%) regretted smoking. FTCD and log-k (DD) scores were positively associated (rs = 0.15, p < .001). Though a strong decline in log-k was shown as reward increased (p's < .001), there were no differences in discounting by regret. Regret was positively associated with worries concerning health effects, quality of life, and finances (p's < .001). Little association was found between DD and future health concerns. CONCLUSIONS/IMPORTANCE: Though this study confirms that regret for smoking is associated with perceived future risks as well as supports previous findings between FTCD and DD, it shows little association between DD and perceived future risks.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence (FTCD); Regret; behavioral economics; delay discounting (DD); dependence
Authors: Leonard H Epstein; Jerry B Richards; Frances G Saad; Rocco A Paluch; James N Roemmich; Caryn Lerman Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Geoffrey T Fong; David Hammond; Fritz L Laux; Mark P Zanna; K Michael Cummings; Ron Borland; Hana Ross Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Christine Sheffer; James Mackillop; John McGeary; Reid Landes; Lawrence Carter; Richard Yi; Bryan Jones; Darren Christensen; Maxine Stitzer; Lisa Jackson; Warren Bickel Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2012-04-06
Authors: Janet Audrain-McGovern; Daniel Rodriguez; Leonard H Epstein; Jocelyn Cuevas; Kelli Rodgers; E Paul Wileyto Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Maggie M Sweitzer; Eric C Donny; Lisa C Dierker; Janine D Flory; Stephen B Manuck Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Richard J O'Connor; Kristie M June; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Matthew C Rousu; James F Thrasher; Andrew Hyland; K Michael Cummings Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2014-01
Authors: Pratibha Nayak; Terry F Pechacek; Paul Slovic; Michael P Eriksen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lucy Popova; Daniel Owusu; Scott R Weaver; Catherine B Kemp; C K Mertz; Terry F Pechacek; Paul Slovic Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-03-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Terry Frank Pechacek; Pratibha Nayak; Paul Slovic; Scott R Weaver; Jidong Huang; Michael P Eriksen Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 7.552