BACKGROUND: Alcohol dependence has repeatedly been associated with impulsive choice, or the inability to choose large delayed rewards over smaller, but more immediate rewards. However, the neural basis of impulsive choice in alcohol use disorders (AUDs) is not well understood. METHODS:One hundred fifty-one individuals with a range of alcohol use from social drinking to severe alcohol dependence completed a delay discounting task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants received customized trials designed to ensure an approximately equivalent number of immediate responses. RESULTS: Delaying gratification recruited regions involved in cognitive control, conflict monitoring, and the interpretation of somatic states. Individuals with more severe alcohol use problems showed increased discounting of delayed rewards and greater activation in several regions including supplementary motor area, insula/orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, and the precuneus. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that impulsive choice in alcohol dependence is the result of functional anomalies in widely distributed, but interconnected brain regions involved in cognitive and emotional control. Furthermore, our results suggest that the neural mechanisms of impulsive choice in AUD both overlaps with that observed in previous studies, and shows that individuals with AUD recruit additional mechanisms when making intertemporal choices.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Alcohol dependence has repeatedly been associated with impulsive choice, or the inability to choose large delayed rewards over smaller, but more immediate rewards. However, the neural basis of impulsive choice in alcohol use disorders (AUDs) is not well understood. METHODS: One hundred fifty-one individuals with a range of alcohol use from social drinking to severe alcohol dependence completed a delay discounting task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Participants received customized trials designed to ensure an approximately equivalent number of immediate responses. RESULTS: Delaying gratification recruited regions involved in cognitive control, conflict monitoring, and the interpretation of somatic states. Individuals with more severe alcohol use problems showed increased discounting of delayed rewards and greater activation in several regions including supplementary motor area, insula/orbitofrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, and the precuneus. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that impulsive choice in alcohol dependence is the result of functional anomalies in widely distributed, but interconnected brain regions involved in cognitive and emotional control. Furthermore, our results suggest that the neural mechanisms of impulsive choice in AUD both overlaps with that observed in previous studies, and shows that individuals with AUD recruit additional mechanisms when making intertemporal choices.
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Thomas J Crowley; Kristen M Raymond; Susan K Mikulich-Gilbertson; Laetitia L Thompson; Carl W Lejuez Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Jennifer G Plebani; Lara A Ray; Meghan E Morean; William R Corbin; James MacKillop; Michael Amlung; Andrea C King Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Simon Zhornitsky; Jaime S Ide; Wuyi Wang; Herta H Chao; Sheng Zhang; Sien Hu; John H Krystal; Chiang-Shan R Li Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2018-10
Authors: Robert F Leeman; Cheryl L Beseler; Christa M Helms; Julie A Patock-Peckham; Vanessa A Wakeling; Christopher W Kahler Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Joseph P Schacht; Raymond F Anton; Patrick K Randall; Xingbao Li; Scott Henderson; Hugh Myrick Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 4.530