Literature DB >> 29146281

Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks.

Catherine C Steele1, Jennifer R Peterson2, Andrew T Marshall3, Sarah L Stuebing1, Kimberly Kirkpatrick4.   

Abstract

The nucleus accumbens core (NAc) has long been recognized as an important contributor to the computation of reward value that is critical for impulsive choice behavior. Impulsive choice refers to choosing a smaller-sooner (SS) over a larger-later (LL) reward when the LL is more optimal in terms of the rate of reward delivery. Two experiments examined the role of the NAc in impulsive choice and its component processes of delay and magnitude processing. Experiment 1 delivered an impulsive choice task with manipulations of LL reward magnitude, followed by a reward magnitude discrimination task. Experiment 2 tested impulsive choice under manipulations of LL delay, followed by temporal bisection and progressive interval tasks. NAc lesions, in comparison to sham control lesions, produced suboptimal preferences that resulted in lower reward earning rates, and led to reduced sensitivity to magnitude and delay within the impulsive choice task. The secondary tasks revealed intact reward magnitude and delay discrimination abilities, but the lesion rats persisted in responding more as the progressive interval increased during the session. The results suggest that the NAc is most critical for demonstrating good sensitivity to magnitude and delay, and adjusting behavior accordingly. Ultimately, the NAc lesions induced suboptimal choice behavior rather than simply promoting impulsive choice, suggesting that an intact NAc is necessary for optimal decision making.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delay discounting; Impulsive choice; Nucleus accumbens core; Reward discrimination; Timing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29146281      PMCID: PMC5729075          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  58 in total

1.  Packet theory of conditioning and timing.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Neural representations of subjective reward value.

Authors:  J Peters; C Büchel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards.

Authors:  Samuel M McClure; David I Laibson; George Loewenstein; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Tracking of the expected time to reinforcement in temporal conditioning procedures.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Russell M Church
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The anova to mixed model transition.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Boris Cheval
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  The role of the nucleus accumbens core in impulsive choice, timing, and reward processing.

Authors:  Tiffany Galtress; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Impulsivity in borderline personality disorder: reward-based decision-making and its relationship to emotional distress.

Authors:  Katherine A Lawrence; J Sabura Allen; Andrew M Chanen
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2010-12

8.  Ability to delay gratification and BMI in preadolescence.

Authors:  Amanda S Bruce; William R Black; Jared M Bruce; Marina Daldalian; Laura E Martin; Ann M Davis
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women.

Authors:  Rosalyn E Weller; Edwin W Cook; Kathy B Avsar; James E Cox
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Mechanisms of impulsive choice: III. The role of reward processes.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.

Authors:  Travis Smith; Kelsey Panfil; Carrie Bailey; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Relationships between Personality Traits and Brain Gray Matter Are Different in Risky and Non-risky Drivers.

Authors:  Laura Mas-Cuesta; Sabina Baltruschat; Antonio Cándido; Andrés Catena
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.342

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.