PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine oncologists' current practice patterns for antibiotic management of low-risk fever and neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-administered survey was developed to query management practices for low-risk FN patients and sent to 3,600 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology physician members; hypothetical case scenarios were included to assess factors influencing decisions about outpatient treatment. RESULTS: Of 3,560 actively practicing oncologists, 1,207 replied (34%). Outpatient antibiotics are used by 82% for selected low-risk FN patients (27% used in them >65% of their patients). Oral levofloxacin (50%), ciprofloxacin (36%), and ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate (35%) are common outpatient regimens. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is used by 45% of oncologists, in a subset of afebrile patients at low risk for FN; growth factors are used adjunctively by 48% for treating low-risk FN. Factors associated with choosing outpatient treatment were: frequency of use in oncologists' own practices, absence of hematologic malignancy, lower patient age, no infiltrate on X-ray, no prior serious infection, shorter expected FN duration, lower creatinine levels, and shorter distance of patient's residence from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: US oncologists, who responded are willing to prescribe outpatient oral antibiotic treatment for low-risk FN, although practices vary considerably and are based on favorable clinical factors. However, practices are often employed that are not recommended for low-risk patients by current guidelines, including fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, adjunctive and/or prophylactic growth factors, and use of levofloxacin for empiric therapy. Educational efforts are needed to better guide cost-effective and supportive care.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine oncologists' current practice patterns for antibiotic management of low-risk fever and neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-administered survey was developed to query management practices for low-risk FN patients and sent to 3,600 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology physician members; hypothetical case scenarios were included to assess factors influencing decisions about outpatient treatment. RESULTS: Of 3,560 actively practicing oncologists, 1,207 replied (34%). Outpatient antibiotics are used by 82% for selected low-risk FN patients (27% used in them >65% of their patients). Oral levofloxacin (50%), ciprofloxacin (36%), and ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate (35%) are common outpatient regimens. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is used by 45% of oncologists, in a subset of afebrile patients at low risk for FN; growth factors are used adjunctively by 48% for treating low-risk FN. Factors associated with choosing outpatient treatment were: frequency of use in oncologists' own practices, absence of hematologic malignancy, lower patient age, no infiltrate on X-ray, no prior serious infection, shorter expected FN duration, lower creatinine levels, and shorter distance of patient's residence from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: US oncologists, who responded are willing to prescribe outpatient oral antibiotic treatment for low-risk FN, although practices vary considerably and are based on favorable clinical factors. However, practices are often employed that are not recommended for low-risk patients by current guidelines, including fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, adjunctive and/or prophylactic growth factors, and use of levofloxacin for empiric therapy. Educational efforts are needed to better guide cost-effective and supportive care.
Authors: Walter T Hughes; Donald Armstrong; Gerald P Bodey; Eric J Bow; Arthur E Brown; Thierry Calandra; Ronald Feld; Philip A Pizzo; Kenneth V I Rolston; Jerry L Shenep; Lowell S Young Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2002-02-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Freifeld; D Marchigiani; T Walsh; S Chanock; L Lewis; J Hiemenz; S Hiemenz; J E Hicks; V Gill; S M Steinberg; P A Pizzo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-07-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Klastersky; M Paesmans; E B Rubenstein; M Boyer; L Elting; R Feld; J Gallagher; J Herrstedt; B Rapoport; K Rolston; J Talcott Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carmen P Escalante; Mary Ann Weiser; Ellen Manzullo; Robert Benjamin; Edgardo Rivera; Tony Lam; Vi Ho; Rosalie Valdres; Eva Lu Lee; Noemi Badrina; Sally Fernandez; Yvette DeJesus; Kenneth Rolston Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: James A Talcott; Beow Y Yeap; Jack A Clark; Robert D Siegel; Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Charles Lu; Paul A Godley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sarah Alexander; Michael Nieder; Danielle M Zerr; Brian T Fisher; Christopher C Dvorak; Lillian Sung Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: O Teuffel; S Cheng; M C Ethier; C Diorio; J Martino; C Mayo; R Wing; L Sung; S M H Alibhai Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: R Kallio; H Aalto; A Takala; P Ohtonen; J Collan; S Siitonen; H Joensuu; H Syrjala; H Repo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jason D Wright; Alfred I Neugut; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Elizabeth T Wilde; Yu-Shiang Lu; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 21.873