Literature DB >> 1952471

Beta-lactam antibiotic therapy in febrile granulocytopenic patients. A randomized trial comparing cefoperazone plus piperacillin, ceftazidime plus piperacillin, and imipenem alone.

D J Winston1, W G Ho, D A Bruckner, R E Champlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, toxicity, and cost-effectiveness of double beta-lactam therapy with monotherapy.
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial. PATIENTS: Febrile, granulocytopenic patients (429).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive iv cefoperazone (3 g every 12 hours) plus piperacillin (75 mg/kg body weight every 6 hours), ceftazidime (2 g every 8 hours) plus piperacillin (75 mg/kg every 6 hours), or imipenem alone (1.0 g or 0.5 g every 6 hours). Patients also received prophylactic vitamin K. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical improvement, eradication of the infecting organism, and toxicity in 403 evaluable patients with one or more infections. MAIN
RESULTS: Cefoperazone and ceftazidime, when given in combination with piperacillin, were equally effective (response rates of 75% (104 of 138 patients) and 74% (101 of 137 patients), respectively). Monotherapy with imipenem had a response rate of 82% (111 of 136 patients) and was as effective as double beta-lactam therapy. Overall antibiotic-related toxicity was minimal, although seizures were associated with high doses of imipenem. Seizures occurred in 3 of 29 patients (10.3%) who were receiving 4 g/d of imipenem, in 3 of 136 patients (2.2%) who were receiving cefoperazone plus piperacillin, in 0 of the 132 patients who were receiving ceftazidime plus piperacillin, and in 1 of 106 patients (0.9%) who were receiving 2 g/d of imipenem (P less than 0.005). The 2-g daily dose of imipenem was as effective as the 4-g daily dose. Diarrhea was more frequent in patients receiving cefoperazone, whereas nausea occurred more often with imipenem. No antibiotic-related hemorrhage or nephrotoxicity was observed. Superinfections caused by beta-lactam-resistant, gram-negative bacilli were uncommon but occurred more frequently with double beta-lactam therapy than with imipenem monotherapy (11 of 268 patients compared with 1 of 135 patients; P = 0.06). Xanthomonas maltophilia superinfections occurred only in patients receiving imipenem (3 of 135 patients compared with 0 of 268 patients; P = 0.03). Imipenem monotherapy was the least expensive therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Cefoperazone and ceftazidime were equally effective when used in combination antibiotic therapy with piperacillin. Twice-daily cefoperazone is less expensive than ceftazidime given three times daily. Monotherapy with imipenem, at a daily dose of 2 g, is as efficacious as double beta-lactam therapy and costs less than combination therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1952471     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-11-849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  27 in total

1.  Open randomized study of cefepime versus piperacillin-gentamicin for treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  D Yamamura; R Gucalp; P Carlisle; M Cimino; J Roberts; C Rotstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A randomized study of imipenem compared to cefotaxime plus piperacillin as initial therapy of infections in granulocytopenic patients.

Authors:  A Böhme; G Just-Nübling; L Bergmann; P M Shah; W Stille; D Hoelzer
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto Infection Program.

Authors:  A Cometta; T Calandra; H Gaya; S H Zinner; R de Bock; A Del Favero; G Bucaneve; F Crokaert; W V Kern; J Klastersky; I Langenaeken; A Micozzi; A Padmos; M Paesmans; C Viscoli; M P Glauser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rGM-CSF): an appraisal of its pharmacoeconomic status in neutropenia associated with chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplant.

Authors:  K L Goa; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF): pharmacoeconomic considerations in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  D Faulds; N J Lewis; R J Milne
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Imipenem or cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with vancomycin for therapy of presumed or proven infection in neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  G Bodey; D Abi-Said; K Rolston; I Raad; E Whimbey
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Meropenem clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J W Mouton; J N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Therapy with cefoperazone plus sulbactam against disseminated infection due to cefoperazone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli in granulocytopenic mice.

Authors:  P H Chandrasekar; J A Sluchak; J A Kruse
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  [Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects].

Authors:  P Harten; B Seyfarth; N Schmitz
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-10-15

Review 10.  Infections in cancer patients: some controversial issues.

Authors:  S C Schimpff; D A Scott; J C Wade
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.