Literature DB >> 15184136

Biomass content governs fermentation rate in nitrogen-deficient wine musts.

Cristian Varela1, Francisco Pizarro, Eduardo Agosin.   

Abstract

Problematic fermentations are common in the wine industry. Assimilable nitrogen deficiency is the most prevalent cause of sluggish fermentations and can reduce fermentation rates significantly. A lack of nitrogen diminishes a yeast's metabolic activity, as well as the biomass yield, although it has not been clear which of these two interdependent factors is more significant in sluggish fermentations. Under winemaking conditions with different initial nitrogen concentrations, metabolic flux analysis was used to isolate the effects. We quantified yeast physiology and identified key metabolic fluxes. We also performed cell concentration experiments to establish how biomass yield affects the fermentation rate. Intracellular analysis showed that trehalose accumulation, which is highly correlated with ethanol production, could be responsible for sustaining cell viability in nitrogen-poor musts independent of the initial assimilable nitrogen content. Other than the higher initial maintenance costs in sluggish fermentations, the main difference between normal and sluggish fermentations was that the metabolic flux distributions in nitrogen-deficient cultures revealed that the specific sugar uptake rate was substantially lower. The results of cell concentration experiments, however, showed that in spite of lower sugar uptake, adding biomass from sluggish cultures not only reduced the time to finish a problematic fermentation but also was less likely to affect the quality of the resulting wine as it did not alter the chemistry of the must.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15184136      PMCID: PMC427798          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.6.3392-3400.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

Review 1.  The molecular genetics of hexose transport in yeasts.

Authors:  E Boles; C P Hollenberg
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  Amino acid transport in eucaryotic microorganisms.

Authors:  J Horák
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1986-12-22

3.  Heat-induced accumulation and futile cycling of trehalose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T Hottiger; P Schmutz; A Wiemken
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Physiological effects of nitrogen starvation in an anaerobic batch culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  U Schulze; G Lidén; J Nielsen; J Villadsen
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Torben L Nissen; Ulrik Schulze; Jens Nielsen; John Villadsen
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  Metabolic flux redistribution in Corynebacterium glutamicum in response to osmotic stress.

Authors:  C Varela; E Agosin; M Baez; M Klapa; G Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Metabolic flux distributions in Penicillium chrysogenum during fed-batch cultivations.

Authors:  H Jørgensen; J Nielsen; J Villadsen; H Møllgaard
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1995-04-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Metabolic flux distributions in Corynebacterium glutamicum during growth and lysine overproduction.

Authors:  J J Vallino; G Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Improvement of nitrogen assimilation and fermentation kinetics under enological conditions by derepression of alternative nitrogen-assimilatory pathways in an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain.

Authors:  J M Salmon; P Barre
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Overproduction of glycolytic enzymes in yeast.

Authors:  I Schaaff; J Heinisch; F K Zimmermann
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.239

View more
  52 in total

1.  Evaluation of gene modification strategies for the development of low-alcohol-wine yeasts.

Authors:  C Varela; D R Kutyna; M R Solomon; C A Black; A Borneman; P A Henschke; I S Pretorius; P J Chambers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Enhancement of glycerol production by UV-mutagenesis of the marine yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus HH16: kinetics and optimization of the fermentation process.

Authors:  Heba Hawary; Abdel-Hamied M Rasmey; Akram A Aboseidah; El-Shahat El-Morsi; Mohamed Hafez
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Identification of genes related to nitrogen uptake in wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Contreras; V García; F Salinas; U Urzúa; M A Ganga; C Martínez
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Assessing the mechanisms responsible for differences between nitrogen requirements of saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeasts in alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  Claire Brice; Isabelle Sanchez; Catherine Tesnière; Bruno Blondin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Examining the role of membrane lipid composition in determining the ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Clark M Henderson; David E Block
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Population size drives industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae alcoholic fermentation and is under genetic control.

Authors:  Warren Albertin; Philippe Marullo; Michel Aigle; Christine Dillmann; Dominique de Vienne; Marina Bely; Delphine Sicard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Adjustment of trehalose metabolism in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to modify ethanol yields.

Authors:  D Rossouw; E H Heyns; M E Setati; S Bosch; F F Bauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Quantitative Physiology of Non-Energy-Limited Retentostat Cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at Near-Zero Specific Growth Rates.

Authors:  Yaya Liu; Anissa El Masoudi; Jack T Pronk; Walter M van Gulik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Ethanol production and maximum cell growth are highly correlated with membrane lipid composition during fermentation as determined by lipidomic analysis of 22 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Clark M Henderson; Michelle Lozada-Contreras; Vladimir Jiranek; Marjorie L Longo; David E Block
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Oxygen response of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 grown under carbon-sufficient, nitrogen-limited enological conditions.

Authors:  Felipe F Aceituno; Marcelo Orellana; Jorge Torres; Sebastián Mendoza; Alex W Slater; Francisco Melo; Eduardo Agosin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.