Literature DB >> 22729542

Evaluation of gene modification strategies for the development of low-alcohol-wine yeasts.

C Varela1, D R Kutyna, M R Solomon, C A Black, A Borneman, P A Henschke, I S Pretorius, P J Chambers.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae has evolved a highly efficient strategy for energy generation which maximizes ATP energy production from sugar. This adaptation enables efficient energy generation under anaerobic conditions and limits competition from other microorganisms by producing toxic metabolites, such as ethanol and CO(2). Yeast fermentative and flavor capacity forms the biotechnological basis of a wide range of alcohol-containing beverages. Largely as a result of consumer demand for improved flavor, the alcohol content of some beverages like wine has increased. However, a global trend has recently emerged toward lowering the ethanol content of alcoholic beverages. One option for decreasing ethanol concentration is to use yeast strains able to divert some carbon away from ethanol production. In the case of wine, we have generated and evaluated a large number of gene modifications that were predicted, or known, to impact ethanol formation. Using the same yeast genetic background, 41 modifications were assessed. Enhancing glycerol production by increasing expression of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene, GPD1, was the most efficient strategy to lower ethanol concentration. However, additional modifications were needed to avoid negatively affecting wine quality. Two strains carrying several stable, chromosomally integrated modifications showed significantly lower ethanol production in fermenting grape juice. Strain AWRI2531 was able to decrease ethanol concentrations from 15.6% (vol/vol) to 13.2% (vol/vol), whereas AWRI2532 lowered ethanol content from 15.6% (vol/vol) to 12% (vol/vol) in both Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon juices. Both strains, however, produced high concentrations of acetaldehyde and acetoin, which negatively affect wine flavor. Further modifications of these strains allowed reduction of these metabolites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729542      PMCID: PMC3416606          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01279-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  45 in total

1.  Pyruvate decarboxylase: an indispensable enzyme for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose.

Authors:  M T Flikweert; L Van Der Zanden; W M Janssen; H Y Steensma; J P Van Dijken; J T Pronk
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production.

Authors:  D R Kutyna; C Varela; G A Stanley; A R Borneman; P A Henschke; P J Chambers
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Reduced pyruvate decarboxylase and increased glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD+] levels enhance glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E Nevoigt; U Stahl
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.239

4.  Metabolic engineering of glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Karin M Overkamp; Barbara M Bakker; Peter Kötter; Marijke A H Luttik; Johannes P Van Dijken; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effects of GPD1 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae commercial wine yeast strains lacking ALD6 genes.

Authors:  Brigitte Cambon; Virginie Monteil; Fabienne Remize; Carole Camarasa; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Glycerol export and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, but not glycerol phosphatase, are rate limiting for glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Remize; L Barnavon; S Dequin
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.783

7.  Evolutionary engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with increased in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway.

Authors:  Axelle Cadière; Anne Ortiz-Julien; Carole Camarasa; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 9.783

8.  Molecular and physiological aspects of alcohol dehydrogenases in the ethanol metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Olga de Smidt; James C du Preez; Jacobus Albertyn
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Effect of gene disruptions of the TCA cycle on production of succinic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Y Arikawa; T Kuroyanagi; M Shimosaka; H Muratsubaki; K Enomoto; R Kodaira; M Okazaki
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Phenotypic characterization of glucose repression mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using experiments with 13C-labelled glucose.

Authors:  Vijayendran Raghevendran; Andreas Karoly Gombert; Bjarke Christensen; Peter Kötter; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.239

View more
  20 in total

1.  Adjustment of trehalose metabolism in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to modify ethanol yields.

Authors:  D Rossouw; E H Heyns; M E Setati; S Bosch; F F Bauer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Flavor impacts of glycerol in the processing of yeast fermented beverages: a review.

Authors:  Xiangdong Zhao; Susanne Procopio; Thomas Becker
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Reduction of ethanol yield and improvement of glycerol formation by adaptive evolution of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under hyperosmotic conditions.

Authors:  Valentin Tilloy; Anne Ortiz-Julien; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The impact of oxygen on the final alcohol content of wine fermented by a mixed starter culture.

Authors:  Pilar Morales; Virginia Rojas; Manuel Quirós; Ramon Gonzalez
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Sequential Fermentation with Selected Immobilized Non-Saccharomyces Yeast for Reduction of Ethanol Content in Wine.

Authors:  Laura Canonico; Francesca Comitini; Lucia Oro; Maurizio Ciani
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Systematic development of biomass overproducing Scheffersomyces stipitis for high-cell-density fermentations.

Authors:  Pornkamol Unrean; Sukanya Jeennor; Kobkul Laoteng
Journal:  Synth Syst Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-05

7.  Diversity of flux distribution in central carbon metabolism of S. cerevisiae strains from diverse environments.

Authors:  Thibault Nidelet; Pascale Brial; Carole Camarasa; Sylvie Dequin
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 5.328

Review 8.  Non-conventional Yeast Species for Lowering Ethanol Content of Wines.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Pilar Morales; Francesca Comitini; Jordi Tronchoni; Laura Canonico; José A Curiel; Lucia Oro; Alda J Rodrigues; Ramon Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Heterologous production of raspberry ketone in the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae via pathway engineering and synthetic enzyme fusion.

Authors:  Danna Lee; Natoiya D R Lloyd; Isak S Pretorius; Anthony R Borneman
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.328

10.  Improving ethanol yield in acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cofactor engineering of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and deletion of ALD6.

Authors:  Ioannis Papapetridis; Marlous van Dijk; Arthur P A Dobbe; Benjamin Metz; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.