Literature DB >> 15183920

Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration.

Karen Ackroff1, Anthony Sclafani.   

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that fructose postingestive reward for flavor preference learning is weaker than that of glucose. The present experiments explored the effects of several variables that modulate the response to fructose. In Experiment 1, ad libitum fed male rats were trained in 22 h sessions with one flavor (the CS+) paired with intragastric infusions of 7.18% fructose and another flavor (the CS-) paired with intragastric water infusion. Subsequent preference for the CS+ relative to the CS- was 90% with saccharin-sweetened flavors and only 67% with nonsweet flavors. Experiments 2 (males) and 3 (females) examined the effects of taste quality on conditioning with 16% fructose infusions. Males and females both preferred the sweet CS+ flavor (71-72%). In contrast, males avoided the nonsweet CS+ flavor (31%) and females were indifferent (47%). The different preference patterns were accompanied by differences in sweet and nonsweet training intakes and bout patterns, suggesting stimulation of intake with sweet flavor and 7.18% fructose, and satiating effects of 16% fructose. The sex difference in response to nonsweet flavors may reflect a greater sensitivity of male rats to fructose's postingestive satiating or aversive effects. Possible mechanisms for the sweet-taste enhancement of conditioning include increasing CS intakes in training, facilitating fructose metabolism and increasing flavor salience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15183920     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2004.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  18 in total

Review 1.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Enhancement of retronasal odors by taste.

Authors:  Barry G Green; Danielle Nachtigal; Samuel Hammond; Juyun Lim
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-14

4.  Operant licking for intragastric sugar infusions: Differential reinforcing actions of glucose, sucrose and fructose in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-17

5.  Influence of ovarian and non-ovarian estrogens on weight gain in response to disruption of sweet taste--calorie relations in female rats.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Camille H Sample; David P Katz
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Post-oral infusion sites that support glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Yeh-Min Yiin; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-12-21

7.  Nutrient-conditioned intake stimulation does not require a distinctive flavor cue in rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12

9.  Cannabinoid self-administration in rats: sex differences and the influence of ovarian function.

Authors:  L Fattore; M S Spano; S Altea; F Angius; P Fadda; W Fratta
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell on the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor-flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Sonia Y Bernal; Irina Dostova; Asher Kest; Yana Abayev; Ester Kandova; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.