Literature DB >> 15178515

Role of surrogate markers in assessing patients with diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome and in evaluating lipid-lowering therapy.

Venkataraman Rajaram1, Sanjay Pandhya, Samir Patel, Peter M Meyer, Marshall Goldin, Matt J M Feinstein, Rachel Neems, Philip R Liebson, Benjamin M Fiedler, James E Macioch, Steven B Feinstein.   

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome (MS) are reaching epidemic proportions in the United States, and cardiovascular disease continues to be the leading cause of death among patients with diabetes. A range of noninvasive screening tools may help reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients with diabetes because of early detection of subclinical cardiovascular disease and active monitoring of the effectiveness of therapy. Surrogate markers of subclinical disease include conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of carotid artery intima-media thickness (c-IMT), 2-dimensional echocardiography, coronary artery calcium imaging, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, ankle-brachial indices, and brachial artery reactivity testing. Because these noninvasive imaging tools are relatively comfortable and entail relatively low risk to the patient, they are ideal for initial screening and for the repeated imaging that is required for monitoring the effectiveness of therapy. Moreover, when used in large numbers of patients with diabetes, prediabetes, and the MS, these imaging tools may be useful in developing and validating thresholds for the use of lipid-lowering therapy as well as clear therapeutic goals for this population. In addition, contrast-enhanced c-IMT scans now produce real-time images of the vasa vasorum and neovascularization of atherosclerotic plaque, potentially causing a paradigm shift in our view of the genesis of atherosclerosis and affecting treatment options for all populations. Thus, surrogate markers may not only help improve individual patient outcomes, they also may help direct scarce medical resources to maximize medical benefits, improve overall medical care, and minimize costs and untoward side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15178515     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

1.  Medical imaging in new drug clinical development.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang Wang; Min Deng
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Steven B Feinstein; Blai Coll; Daniel Staub; Dan Adam; Arend F L Schinkel; Folkert J ten Cate; Kai Thomenius
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Vascular ultrasound for atherosclerosis imaging.

Authors:  Chris L de Korte; Hendrik H G Hansen; Anton F W van der Steen
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Evaluation of the stability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Sun; Jun Wang; Xiao-Li Wu; Hui-Ying Xu; Ying-Qi Xing; Fang Yang
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors in women with uterine leimyoma: is there a link with atherosclerosis?

Authors:  Nasir Sivri; Tülin Yalta; Cenk Sayın; Kenan Yalta; Fulya Ozpuyan; Ebru Taştekin; Ertan Yetkin
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

6.  Carotid intraplaque neovascularization predicts coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Laura E Mantella; Kayla N Colledanchise; Marie-France Hétu; Steven B Feinstein; Joseph Abunassar; Amer M Johri
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Clinical, ethical and financial implications of incidental imaging findings: experience from a phase I trial in healthy elderly volunteers.

Authors:  David J Pinato; Chara Stavraka; Mark Tanner; Audrey Esson; Eric W Jacobson; Martin R Wilkins; Vincenzo Libri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Metabolic profiling of the response to an oral glucose tolerance test detects subtle metabolic changes.

Authors:  Suzan Wopereis; Carina M Rubingh; Marjan J van Erk; Elwin R Verheij; Trinette van Vliet; Nicole H P Cnubben; Age K Smilde; Jan van der Greef; Ben van Ommen; Henk F J Hendriks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Novel insights into an old controversy: is coronary artery ectasia a variant of coronary atherosclerosis?

Authors:  Ertan Yetkin; Johannes Waltenberger
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Relation of epicardial fat thickness with carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mustafa Cetin; Musa Cakici; Mustafa Polat; Arif Suner; Cemil Zencir; Idris Ardic
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.