Literature DB >> 22263053

Medical imaging in new drug clinical development.

Yi-Xiang Wang1, Min Deng.   

Abstract

Medical imaging can help answer key questions that arise during the drug development process. The role of medical imaging in new drug clinical trials includes identification of likely responders; detection and diagnosis of lesions and evaluation of their severity; and therapy monitoring and follow-up. Nuclear imaging techniques such as PET can be used to monitor drug pharmacokinetics and distribution and study specific molecular endpoints. In assessing drug efficacy, imaging biomarkers and imaging surrogate endpoints can be more objective and faster to measure than clinical outcomes, and allow small group sizes, quick results and good statistical power. Imaging also has important role in drug safety monitoring, particularly when there is no other suitable biomarkers available. Despite the long history of radiological sciences, its application to the drug development process is relatively recent. This review highlights the processes, opportunities, and challenges of medical imaging in new drug development.

Keywords:  clinical development; clinical trials; diagnostic radiology; medical imaging; new drug; pharmaceutical industry

Year:  2010        PMID: 22263053      PMCID: PMC3256476          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2010.11.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  63 in total

Review 1.  On the development of rational standards for nuclear response evaluation.

Authors:  G R Laking; P M Price
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-03

2.  MRI as a biomarker of disease progression in a therapeutic trial of milameline for AD.

Authors:  C R Jack; M Slomkowski; S Gracon; T M Hoover; J P Felmlee; K Stewart; Y Xu; M Shiung; P C O'Brien; R Cha; D Knopman; R C Petersen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  Using imaging biomarkers to accelerate drug development and clinical trials.

Authors:  Homer H Pien; Alan J Fischman; James H Thrall; A Gregory Sorensen
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 4.  The role of clinical imaging in oncological drug development.

Authors:  P S Murphy; T J McCarthy; A S K Dzik-Jurasz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs.

Authors:  John R Johnson; Grant Williams; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Imaging-based measures of disease progression in clinical trials of disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Brandy Matthews; Eric R Siemers; P David Mozley
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 8.  Positron emission tomography microdosing: a new concept with application in tracer and early clinical drug development.

Authors:  Mats Bergström; Anders Grahnén; Bengt Långström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Vigabatrin-induced lesions in the rat brain demonstrated by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  G D Jackson; S R Williams; R O Weller; N van Bruggen; N E Preece; S C Williams; W H Butler; J S Duncan
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.045

10.  Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer.

Authors:  Christopher G Willett; Yves Boucher; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Dan G Duda; Lance L Munn; Ricky T Tong; Daniel C Chung; Dushyant V Sahani; Sanjeeva P Kalva; Sergey V Kozin; Mari Mino; Kenneth S Cohen; David T Scadden; Alan C Hartford; Alan J Fischman; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Ryan; Andrew X Zhu; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Helen X Chen; Paul C Shellito; Gregory Y Lauwers; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-01-25       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Liver intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive review of published data on normal values and applications for fibrosis and tumor evaluation.

Authors:  Yáo T Li; Jean-Pierre Cercueil; Jing Yuan; Weitian Chen; Romaric Loffroy; Yì Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-02

2.  The impact of quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery: Charting our course for the future.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang; Chin K Ng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2011-12

Review 3.  T1ρ magnetic resonance: basic physics principles and applications in knee and intervertebral disc imaging.

Authors:  Yì-Xiáng J Wáng; Qinwei Zhang; Xiaojuan Li; Weitian Chen; Anil Ahuja; Jing Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Recent advances in superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for cellular imaging and targeted therapy research.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang; Shouhu Xuan; Marc Port; Jean-Marc Idee
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 5.  Neutrophil Elastase Activity Imaging: Recent Approaches in the Design and Applications of Activity-Based Probes and Substrate-Based Probes.

Authors:  Natacha Jugniot; Pierre Voisin; Abderrazzak Bentaher; Philippe Mellet
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  Imaging biomarkers for evaluating tumor response: RECIST and beyond.

Authors:  Ching-Chung Ko; Lee-Ren Yeh; Yu-Ting Kuo; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2021-07-02

Review 7.  Tumor Drug Penetration Measurements Could Be the Neglected Piece of the Personalized Cancer Treatment Puzzle.

Authors:  Imke H Bartelink; Ella F Jones; Sheerin K Shahidi-Latham; Pei Rong Evelyn Lee; Yanan Zheng; Paolo Vicini; Laura van 't Veer; Denise Wolf; Andrei Iagaru; Deanna L Kroetz; Brendan Prideaux; Cornelius Cilliers; Greg M Thurber; Zena Wimana; Geraldine Gebhart
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 6.875

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.