Literature DB >> 31621834

Carotid intraplaque neovascularization predicts coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events.

Laura E Mantella1, Kayla N Colledanchise1, Marie-France Hétu2, Steven B Feinstein3, Joseph Abunassar2, Amer M Johri1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: It is thought that the majority of cardiovascular (CV) events are caused by vulnerable plaque. Such lesions are rupture prone, in part due to neovascularization. It is postulated that plaque vulnerability may be a systemic process and that vulnerable lesions may co-exist at multiple sites in the vascular bed. This study sought to examine whether carotid plaque vulnerability, characterized by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-assessed intraplaque neovascularization (IPN), was associated with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and future CV events. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We investigated carotid IPN using carotid CEUS in 459 consecutive stable patients referred for coronary angiography. IPN was graded based on the presence and location of microbubbles within each plaque (0, not visible; 1, peri-adventitial; and 2, plaque core). The grades of each plaque were averaged to obtain an overall score per patient. Coronary plaque severity and complexity was also determined angiographically. Patients were followed for 30 days following their angiogram. This study found that a higher CEUS-assessed carotid IPN score was associated with significant CAD (≥50% stenosis) (1.8 ± 0.4 vs. 0.5 ± 0.6, P < 0.0001) and greater complexity of coronary lesions (1.7 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.8, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, an IPN score ≥1.25 could predict significant CAD with a high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (89%). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of participants having CV events with an IPN score ≥1.25 (P = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: Carotid plaque neovascularization was found to be predictive of significant and complex CAD and future CV events. CEUS-assessed carotid IPN is a clinically useful tool for CV risk stratification in high-risk cardiac patients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carotid; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; coronary artery disease; neovascularization; vulnerable plaque

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31621834      PMCID: PMC6806260          DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  24 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity.

Authors:  Stefano Coli; Marco Magnoni; Giuseppe Sangiorgi; Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta; Giulio Melisurgo; Alessandro Mauriello; Luigi Spagnoli; Roberto Chiesa; Domenico Cianflone; Attilio Maseri
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

3.  Carotid Ultrasound Maximum Plaque Height-A Sensitive Imaging Biomarker for the Assessment of Significant Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Amer M Johri; Pearl Behl; Marie-France Hétu; Mohammad Haqqi; Paul Ewart; Andrew G Day; Brendan Parfrey; Murray F Matangi
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 1.724

4.  Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J A Goldstein; D Demetriou; C L Grines; M Pica; M Shoukfeh; W W O'Neill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the vasa vasorum: from early atherosclerosis to the identification of unstable plaques.

Authors:  Daniel Staub; Arend F L Schinkel; Blai Coll; Stefano Coli; Antonius F W van der Steen; Jess D Reed; Christian Krueger; Kai E Thomenius; Dan Adam; Eric J Sijbrands; Folkert J ten Cate; Steven B Feinstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-07

Review 6.  Role of surrogate markers in assessing patients with diabetes mellitus and the metabolic syndrome and in evaluating lipid-lowering therapy.

Authors:  Venkataraman Rajaram; Sanjay Pandhya; Samir Patel; Peter M Meyer; Marshall Goldin; Matt J M Feinstein; Rachel Neems; Philip R Liebson; Benjamin M Fiedler; James E Macioch; Steven B Feinstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011.

Authors:  P-J Touboul; M G Hennerici; S Meairs; H Adams; P Amarenco; N Bornstein; L Csiba; M Desvarieux; S Ebrahim; R Hernandez Hernandez; M Jaff; S Kownator; T Naqvi; P Prati; T Rundek; M Sitzer; U Schminke; J-C Tardif; A Taylor; E Vicaut; K S Woo
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 8.  From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I.

Authors:  Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of carotid plaque neovascularization is useful for identifying high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Juntaro Deyama; Takamitsu Nakamura; Isao Takishima; Daisuke Fujioka; Ken-ichi Kawabata; Jun-ei Obata; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Yosuke Watanabe; Yukio Saito; Hideto Mishina; Kiyotaka Kugiyama
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 10.  Carotid ultrasonography: A potent tool for better clinical practice in diagnosis of atherosclerosis in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Naoto Katakami; Hideaki Kaneto; Iichiro Shimomura
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 4.232

View more
  13 in total

1.  Multiclass machine learning vs. conventional calculators for stroke/CVD risk assessment using carotid plaque predictors with coronary angiography scores as gold standard: a 500 participants study.

Authors:  Ankush D Jamthikar; Deep Gupta; Laura E Mantella; Luca Saba; John R Laird; Amer M Johri; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Visualization of Microvascular Angiogenesis Using Dual-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Acoustic Angiography: A Review.

Authors:  Isabel G Newsome; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Role of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular risk prediction and outcomes: comparison of machine-learning and conventional statistical approaches for the analysis of carotid ultrasound features and intra-plaque neovascularization.

Authors:  Amer M Johri; Laura E Mantella; Ankush D Jamthikar; Luca Saba; John R Laird; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Advanced ultrasound techniques in arterial diseases.

Authors:  Xin Li; Demosthenes Cokkinos; Sameer Gadani; Vasileios Rafailidis; Markus Aschwanden; Abraham Levitin; Diane Szaflarski; Levester Kirksey; Daniel Staub; Sasan Partovi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Contrast Ultrasound, Sonothrombolysis and Sonoperfusion in Cardiovascular Disease: Shifting to Theragnostic Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Soufiane El Kadi; Thomas R Porter; Niels J W Verouden; Albert C van Rossum; Otto Kamp
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-10-13

Review 6.  Multimodality carotid plaque tissue characterization and classification in the artificial intelligence paradigm: a narrative review for stroke application.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Skandha S Sanagala; Suneet K Gupta; Vijaya K Koppula; Amer M Johri; Narendra N Khanna; Sophie Mavrogeni; John R Laird; Gyan Pareek; Martin Miner; Petros P Sfikakis; Athanasios Protogerou; Durga P Misra; Vikas Agarwal; Aditya M Sharma; Vijay Viswanathan; Vijay S Rathore; Monika Turk; Raghu Kolluri; Klaudija Viskovic; Elisa Cuadrado-Godia; George D Kitas; Neeraj Sharma; Andrew Nicolaides; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

7.  [Carotid intraplaque neovascularization is correlated with the risk of revascularization following percutaneous coronary intervention].

Authors:  Y Han; X Fei; L Ren; J Wang; T Chen; J Guo; Q Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 8.  Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Diabetic Retinopathy via Atherosclerotic Pathway in COVID-19/Non-COVID-19 Frameworks Using Artificial Intelligence Paradigm: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Smiksha Munjral; Mahesh Maindarkar; Puneet Ahluwalia; Anudeep Puvvula; Ankush Jamthikar; Tanay Jujaray; Neha Suri; Sudip Paul; Rajesh Pathak; Luca Saba; Renoh Johnson Chalakkal; Suneet Gupta; Gavino Faa; Inder M Singh; Paramjit S Chadha; Monika Turk; Amer M Johri; Narendra N Khanna; Klaudija Viskovic; Sophie Mavrogeni; John R Laird; Gyan Pareek; Martin Miner; David W Sobel; Antonella Balestrieri; Petros P Sfikakis; George Tsoulfas; Athanasios Protogerou; Durga Prasanna Misra; Vikas Agarwal; George D Kitas; Raghu Kolluri; Jagjit Teji; Mustafa Al-Maini; Surinder K Dhanjil; Meyypan Sockalingam; Ajit Saxena; Aditya Sharma; Vijay Rathore; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad; Vijay Viswanathan; Padukode R Krishnan; Tomaz Omerzu; Subbaram Naidu; Andrew Nicolaides; Mostafa M Fouda; Jasjit S Suri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-14

9.  The association of lipoprotein(a) and intraplaque neovascularization in patients with carotid stenosis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Shuang Xia; Weida Qiu; Anping Cai; Bo Kong; Lan Xu; Zejia Wu; Liwen Li
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Carotid intraplaque neovascularisation as a predictive factor for future vascular events in patients with mild and moderate carotid stenosis: an observational prospective study.

Authors:  Liuping Cui; Yingqi Xing; Yangyang Zhou; Lijuan Wang; Kangding Liu; Daofu Zhang; Ying Chen
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 6.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.