Literature DB >> 7649514

[The dental and skeletal effects of the jumping-the-bite plate and high-pull headgear combination. A clinical study of treated patients].

A Wichelhaus1, F G Sander.   

Abstract

While planning treatment of the 30 patients with a dental and skeletal class II anomaly on which this study is based, the primary treatment goals were correction of the dental and skeletal structures and attenuation of vertical growth by means of influencing the maxillary skeletal structures and the resultant mandibular reaction. The desired treatment results were achieved in all patients. Even so, however, the effects on individual patients in respect to skeletal influences were markedly different. It was especially helpful that during therapy simultaneously with exerting influence on the maxillary base plane, the influencing of the occlusal plane occurred in the same direction. Through the additional application of high-pull headgear, maxillary growth was clearly restrained and the inclination of the maxillary base plane inhibited. Even difficult skeletal discrepancies, sagittal as well as vertical, can be treated with the bite-jump appliance in combination with a high-pull headgear. This also makes it possible to achieve protrusive repositioning of the mandible in patients with a pronounced vertical growth pattern without causing on open bite. In retrospective the patients' treatment plans proved to be completely appropriate, however, the fact should not be overlooked that changing the occlusal plane is essential for the realization of a positive therapeutic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7649514     DOI: 10.1007/bf02168133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop        ISSN: 0015-816X


  44 in total

1.  [The effect of cervical headgear. A clinical on facial skeleton study].

Authors:  P Abbühl
Journal:  Inf Orthod Kieferorthop       Date:  1976-04

2.  [The modification of growth with the jumping-the-bite plate compared to other functional orthodontic appliances].

Authors:  F G Sander; C Lassak
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1990-06

3.  Cephalometric changes from activator-headgear treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.

Authors:  E Kigele
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1987-07

4.  A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy.

Authors:  S D Hamilton; P M Sinclair; R H Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  A computerized appraisal of the high-pull face-bow.

Authors:  W G Watson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1972-12

6.  The use of activators in a system employing fixed appliances.

Authors:  A Hasund
Journal:  Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc       Date:  1969

7.  Heavy intermittent cervical traction in class II treatment: a longitudinal cephalometric assessment.

Authors:  C M Mills; R G Holman; T M Graber
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1978-10

8.  A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.

Authors:  U Teuscher
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1978-09

9.  Morphologic changes in the sagittal dimension using the Fränkel appliance.

Authors:  A H Owen
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1981-12

10.  [Long-term results after activator treatment].

Authors:  E Schadlbauer
Journal:  Inf Orthod Kieferorthop       Date:  1984
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.