Literature DB >> 15157788

Intrauterine devices and reproductive health: American women in feast and famine.

David Hubacher1, Diana Cheng.   

Abstract

Intrauterine contraception has been available in the United States since the early 1960s. During the past 4 decades, American women have mainly used nine different devices and accumulated approximately 47 million person-years of use. Interest in IUDs, as expressed by both use patterns and market forces that created and retired products, varied tremendously over this period. In the peak years, women had unfettered access to, and choice of, IUDs, over time availability has declined. The American experience with IUDs involved a unique combination of factors: invention, expansion of publicly funded services, mass media, medical missteps, conflicting research, medical opinion and tort law. The IUD generated a controversial balance sheet of risks, benefits and reputation that still impacts reproductive health today. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15157788     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

Review 1.  [The family doctor facing IUD insertion].

Authors:  L Arribas-Mir; A Ortega Del Moral; M Jódar-Reyes
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Duration of use of a levonorgestrel IUS amongst nulliparous and adolescent women.

Authors:  Tiffany Behringer; Matthew F Reeves; Brianna Rossiter; Beatrice A Chen; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Impact of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System on the Progression of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection to Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in a Baboon Model.

Authors:  Alison J Eastman; Ingrid L Bergin; Daniel Chai; Christine M Bassis; William LeBar; George O Oluoch; Emma R Liechty; Atunga Nyachieo; Vincent B Young; David M Aronoff; Dorothy L Patton; Jason D Bell
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Who is using long-acting reversible contraceptive methods? Findings from nine low-fertility countries.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney; Jessica D Gipson
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-07-14

5.  The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-21

6.  Halo and spillover effect illustrations for selected beneficial medical devices and drugs.

Authors:  Brent D Kerger; Autumn Bernal; Dennis J Paustenbach; Gavin Huntley-Fenner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Intrauterine devices and endometrial cancer risk: a pooled analysis of the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Mia M Gaudet; Carlo La Vecchia; Christina M Nagle; Xiao Ou Shu; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans Olov Adami; Shirley Beresford; Leslie Bernstein; Chu Chen; Linda S Cook; Immaculata De Vivo; Jennifer A Doherty; Christine M Friedenreich; Susan M Gapstur; Dierdre Hill; Pamela L Horn-Ross; James V Lacey; Fabio Levi; Xiaolin Liang; Lingeng Lu; Anthony Magliocco; Susan E McCann; Eva Negri; Sara H Olson; Julie R Palmer; Alpa V Patel; Stacey Petruzella; Jennifer Prescott; Harvey A Risch; Lynn Rosenberg; Mark E Sherman; Amanda B Spurdle; Penelope M Webb; Lauren A Wise; Yong-Bing Xiang; Wanghong Xu; Hannah P Yang; Herbert Yu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 7.316

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.