Literature DB >> 22018136

Duration of use of a levonorgestrel IUS amongst nulliparous and adolescent women.

Tiffany Behringer1, Matthew F Reeves, Brianna Rossiter, Beatrice A Chen, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices are cost-effective if used for 2 or more years. Early discontinuation may lead to reduced cost-effectiveness of this method and unintended pregnancy if other contraceptives are not used. This study sought to examine rates and reasons for discontinuation of IUS use in adolescents versus older women and nulliparous versus parous women, as these groups may be more likely to discontinue use. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of women receiving a levonorgestrel IUS between June 2005 and April 2008 was conducted. Medical records were reviewed for all visits following placement of the IUS; rates and reasons for IUS discontinuation were calculated and categorized. Data were examined under two scenarios: (1) assuming that all women not seen for follow-up continued IUS use and (2) only including women with follow-up visits. Cox regression was used to control for age, parity, race and marital status in comparing rates of IUS discontinuation and expulsion in nulliparous versus parous women and adolescents versus older women.
RESULTS: Of the 828 women included in this analysis, 104 (12.6%) were nulliparous, and 131 (15.8%) were ≤20 years of age. Nulliparous women were not more likely than parous women to have expelled their IUS [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.40 (0.57, 3.43)]. Adolescent women were more likely to experience expulsion than older women, although this did not reach statistical significance [hazard ratio, 1.49 (0.76, 2.92)]. When we looked at reasons for IUS removal, we found that nulliparous women were not more likely than parous women to have their IUS removed because of dissatisfaction with the contraceptive method (6.7% vs. 11.5%, p=.15) or desire to become pregnant (1.9% vs. 2.6%, p=.50). Similarly, adolescents were not more likely than older women to have their IUS removed because of dissatisfaction with the contraceptive method (10.7% vs. 10.9%, p=.94) or desire to become pregnant (3.1% vs. 2.4%, p=.43).
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents and nulliparous women are not more likely to prematurely discontinue use of their IUS than adult or parous women.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22018136      PMCID: PMC3200533          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  Health effects of long-term use of the intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing system. A follow-up study over 12 years of continuous use.

Authors:  M Rönnerdag; V Odlind
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.

Authors:  Nancy L Stanwood; Joanne M Garrett; Thomas R Konrad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Time to pardon the IUD?

Authors:  P D Darney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Stanley K Henshaw
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2006-06

5.  Unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  S K Henshaw
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

6.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Stuart M Berman
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2006-08-04

7.  Economic analysis of contraceptives for women.

Authors:  Chiun Fang Chiou; James Trussell; Eileen Reyes; Kevin Knight; Joel Wallace; Jay Udani; Karen Oda; Jeff Borenstein
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 8.  The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Sarah Prager; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 9.  Intrauterine devices and reproductive health: American women in feast and famine.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Diana Cheng
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Frank A Sonnenberg; Ronald T Burkman; C Greg Hagerty; Leon Speroff; Theodore Speroff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice: Contraception in adolescents.

Authors:  Johan Verhaeghe
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Characteristics associated with discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception within the first 6 months of use.

Authors:  Danielle S Grunloh; Teya Casner; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Halley E M Riley; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents.

Authors:  Colleen McNicholas; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.927

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.