Literature DB >> 15152927

Investigation of the optimal backscatter for an aSi electronic portal imaging device.

Lung Ko1, Jong Oh Kim, Jeffrey V Siebers.   

Abstract

The effects of backscattered radiation on the dosimetric response of the Varian aS500 amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) are studied. Measurements demonstrate that radiation backscattered from the EPID mechanical support structure causes 5% asymmetries in the detected signal. To minimize the effect of backscattered radiation from the support structure, this work proposes adding material downstream of the EPID phosphor which provides uniform backscattering material to the phosphor and attenuates backscatter from the support structure before it reaches the phosphor. Two material locations were studied: downstream of the existing image cassette and within the cassette, immediately downstream of the flat-panel imager glass panel. Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine the thicknesses of water, Pb and Cu backscattering materials required to saturate the backscattered signal response for 6 MV and 18 MV beams for material thicknesses up to 50 mm. Water was unable to saturate the backscattered signal for thicknesses up to 50 mm for both energies. For Pb, to obtain a signal within 1% of saturation, 3 mm was required at 6 MV, and 6.8 mm was required at 18 MV. For Cu, thicknesses of 20.6 mm and 22.6 mm were required for the 6 MV and 18 MV beams, respectively. For saturation thicknesses, at 6 MV, the Cu backscatter enhanced the signal more than for Pb (Cu 1.25, Pb 1.11), but at 18 MV the reverse was found (Cu 1.19, Pb 1.23). This is due to the fact that at 6 MV, the backscattered radiation signal is dominated by low-energy scattered photons, which are readily attenuated by the Pb, while at 18 MV, electron backscatter contributes substantially to the signal. Image blurring caused by backscatter spread was less for Pb than Cu. Placing Pb immediately downstream of the glass panel further reduced the signal spread and increased the backscatter enhancement to 1.20 and 1.39 for the 6 MV and 18 MV beams, respectively. Overall, it is determined that adding approximately 5 mm of Pb between the detector and the mechanical support structure will substantially reduce the nonuniformity in the backscattered signals for 6 MV and 18 MV photon beams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15152927     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/9/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  Practical guidelines for routine intensity-modulated radiotherapy verification: pre-treatment verification with portal dosimetry and treatment verification with in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  A J Vinall; A J Williams; V E Currie; A Van Esch; D Huyskens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers.

Authors:  Song Wang; Joseph K Gardner; John J Gordon; Weidong Li; Luke Clews; Peter B Greer; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements.

Authors:  Arpita Agarwal; Nikhil Rastogi; K J Maria Das; S A Yoganathan; D Udayakumar; Shaleen Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  A Monte Carlo study of the impact of phosphor optical properties on EPID imaging performance.

Authors:  Mengying Shi; Marios Myronakis; Yue-Houng Hu; Daniel Morf; Joerg Rottmann; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Testing the portal imager GLAaS algorithm for machine quality assurance.

Authors:  G Nicolini; E Vanetti; A Clivio; A Fogliata; G Boka; L Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Fast 3D dosimetric verifications based on an electronic portal imaging device using a GPU calculation engine.

Authors:  Jinhan Zhu; Lixin Chen; Along Chen; Guangwen Luo; Xiaowu Deng; Xiaowei Liu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Experimental verification of a 3D in vivo dose monitoring system based on EPID.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Wang; Lixin Chen; Conghua Xie; Dajiang Wang; Gaili Chen; Zhengming Fu; Hui Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-30

8.  Comparison between an in-house 1D profile correction method and a 2D correction provided in Varian's PDPC Package for improving the accuracy of portal dosimetry images.

Authors:  Maritza A Hobson; Stephen D Davis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  EPID-based dosimetry to verify IMRT planar dose distribution for the aS1200 EPID and FFF beams.

Authors:  Narges Miri; Peter Keller; Benjamin J Zwan; Peter Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  On flattening filter-free portal dosimetry.

Authors:  Eduardo Pardo; Juan Castro Novais; María Yolanda Molina López; Sheila Ruiz Maqueda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.