Literature DB >> 29356873

Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.

R Mager1, M Kurosch2, T Höfner2, S Frees2, A Haferkamp2, A Neisius2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze clinical outcomes and costs of single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes in comparison with reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes in a tertiary referral center. Prospectively, 68 flexible ureterorenoscopies utilizing reusable (Flex-X2S, Flex-XC, Karl Storz) and 68 applying single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes (LithoVue, Boston Scientific) were collected. Clinical outcome parameters such as overall success rate, complication rates according to Clavien-Dindo, operation time and radiation exposure time were measured. Cost analysis was based on purchase costs and recurrent costs for repair and reprocessing divided by number of procedures. In each group 68 procedures were available for evaluation. In 91% of reusable and 88% of single-use ureterorenoscopies stone disease was treated with a mean stone burden of 101 ± 226 and 90 ± 244 mm2 and lower pole involvement in 47 and 41%, respectively (p > 0.05). Comparing clinical outcomes of reusable vs. single-use instruments revealed no significant difference for overall success rates (81 vs. 87%), stone-free rates (82 vs. 85%), operation time (76.2 ± 46.8 vs. 76.8 ± 40.2 min), radiation exposure time (3.83 ± 3.15 vs. 3.93 ± 4.43 min) and complication rates (7 vs. 17%) (p > 0.05). A wide range of repair and purchase costs resulted in total to $1212-$1743 per procedure for reusable ureterorenoscopy whereas price of single-use ureterorenoscopy was $1300-$3180 per procedure. The current work provided evidence for equal clinical effectiveness of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes. Partially overlapping ranges of costs for single-use and reusable scopes stress the importance to precisely know the expenses and caseload when negotiating purchase prices, repair prices and warranty conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome; Costs; Disposable; Flexible ureterorenoscopy; Single use

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29356873     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-018-1042-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  29 in total

1.  Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  J W Collins; F X Keeley; A Timoney
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Ureteroscope cleaning and sterilization by the urology operating room team: the effect on repair costs.

Authors:  Michelle Jo Semins; Susanna George; Mohamad E Allaf; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Decreasing the cost of flexible ureterorenoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Bhaskar K Somani; A Robertson; Slawomir G Kata
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Outcomes of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Solitary Renal Stones in the CROES URS Global Study.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Andreas J Gross; Alfred Krebs; Dogan Unal; Eduardo Bercowsky; Ehab Eltahawy; Bhaskar Somani; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Renal and Proximal Ureteral Stone in Patients with Previous Ureteral Stenting: Impact on Stone-Free Rate and Morbidity.

Authors:  Jean-François Dessyn; Loïc Balssa; Eric Chabannes; Baptiste Jacquemet; Stéphane Bernardini; Hugues Bittard; Guillaume Guichard; François Kleinclauss
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility study.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Guido Kamphuis; Guido Giusti; Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Thomas Knoll; Palle Jörn Osther; Cesare Scoffone; Daniel Pérez-Fentes; Silvia Proietti; Oliver Wiseman; Jean de la Rosette; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Durability of the next-generation flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes: a randomized prospective multi-institutional clinical trial.

Authors:  Bodo Knudsen; Ricardo Miyaoka; Ketul Shah; Timothy Holden; Thomas M T Turk; Renato N Pedro; Carly Kriedberg; Bryan Hinck; Omar Ortiz-Alvarado; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  External Comparison of Recent Predictive Nomograms for Stone-Free Rate Using Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy with Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Akif Erbin; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ibrahim Buldu; Harun Ozdemir; Muhammet Tosun; Murat Binbay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  The cost analysis of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 302 cases.

Authors:  Cenk Gurbuz; Gokhan Atış; Ozgur Arikan; Ozgur Efilioglu; Asıf Yıldırım; Onur Danacıoglu; Turhan Caskurlu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.

Authors:  Silvia Proietti; Laurian Dragos; Wilson Molina; Steeve Doizi; Guido Giusti; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Alvaro Jiménez Godínez; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 2.  Duodenoscope-associated infections: a review.

Authors:  Gheorghe G Balan; Catalin Victor Sfarti; Stefan Andrei Chiriac; Carol Stanciu; Anca Trifan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group.

Authors:  Michele Talso; Ioannis K Goumas; Guido M Kamphuis; Laurian Dragos; Tzevat Tefik; Olivier Traxer; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

4.  WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ahmed I Ali; Amr Eldakhakhny; Abdelsalam Abdelfadel; Mahmoud F Rohiem; Mohamed Elbadry; Ali Hassan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Stone removing efficiency and safety comparison between single use ureteroscope and reusable ureteroscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Ma; Zhong-Yu Jian; Xi Jin; Hong Li; Kun-Jie Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

6.  Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre?

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Niamh Smyth; Steeve Doizi; Alvaro Jiménez Godínez; Yazeed Barghouthy; Mariela Alejandra Corrales Acosta; Hatem Kamkoum; Bhaskar Somani; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  LithoVue™ for renal stone therapy - a perfect fit for high volume academic centers; a retrospective evaluation of 108 cases.

Authors:  Maximilian Pallauf; Sabina Sevcenco; Christopher Steiner; Martin Drerup; Michael Mitterberger; Daniela Colleselli; Lukas Lusuardi; Thomas Kunit
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 8.  Current State of Surgical Lighting.

Authors:  Jahnavi Curlin; Charles K Herman
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-06-19

Review 9.  A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices.

Authors:  Giovanni S Marchini; Fábio C Torricelli; Carlos A Batagello; Manoj Monga; Fábio C Vicentini; Alexandre Danilovic; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Reporting and grading of complications after mid-urethral sling surgeries: Could the "Clavien-Dindo Classification" be adopted?

Authors:  Ahmed S El-Hefnawy; Bassem S Wadie
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.