Literature DB >> 21643664

Survey of brucellosis at the wildlife-livestock interface on the Zimbabwean side of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area.

Calvin Gomo1, Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky, Alexandre Caron, Davies Mubika Pfukenyi.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis in communal cattle and wildlife at a wildlife-livestock interface in the southeast lowveld of Zimbabwe, part of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. RBT and c-Elisa were used in serial for detection of antibodies against Brucella spp. Between July 2007 and October 2009, a total of 1,158 cattle were tested and the overall seroprevalence of brucellosis was 9.9%. A total of 97 wild animals (African buffaloes (n=47), impala (n=33), kudu (n=16), and giraffe (n=1)) were tested and only one animal (giraffe) was seropositive for brucellosis (1.03%). Brucella seroprevalence showed an increasing trend with age, with adult cattle (>6 years) recording the highest seroprevalence (11.1%), but the differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, female cattle recorded a relatively higher seroprevalence (10.8%) compared to males (7.9%), but the difference was not significant. However, a significant (P<0.001) association between Brucella seropositivity and abortion history was recorded in female cattle. Similarly, Brucella seropositivity was significantly (P<0.01) associated with a history of grazing in the park for female cattle. Overall, from the interface area, cattle with a history of grazing in the park recorded a significantly (P<0.01) higher Brucella seroprevalence (13.5%) compared to those with no history of grazing in the park (4.9%). The significant association between abortion history and seropositivity observed in this study illustrates the potential economic significance of Brucella in cattle in this area. Hence, public awareness and further epidemiological studies of the disease in wildlife, livestock, and humans in the study area are of great importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21643664     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-9890-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  27 in total

Review 1.  Current understanding of the genetic diversity of Brucella, an expanding genus of zoonotic pathogens.

Authors:  Adrian M Whatmore
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 2.  Brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiology, control and impact.

Authors:  John J McDermott; S M Arimi
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Brucellosis in Rhodesian Wildlife.

Authors:  J B Condy; D B Vickers
Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 1.474

4.  Herd-level factors for Brucella seropositivity in cattle reared in smallholder dairy farms of Zimbabwe.

Authors:  G Matope; E Bhebhe; J B Muma; A Lund; E Skjerve
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Epidemiology and management of a bovine brucellosis cluster in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  D A Abernethy; J Moscard-Costello; E Dickson; R Harwood; K Burns; E McKillop; S McDowell; D U Pfeiffer
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  Risk factors for brucellosis in indigenous cattle reared in livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zambia.

Authors:  J B Muma; K L Samui; J Oloya; M Munyeme; E Skjerve
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  K Nielsen; P Smith; J Widdison; D Gall; L Kelly; W Kelly; P Nicoletti
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  A new homogeneous assay for high throughput serological diagnosis of brucellosis in ruminants.

Authors:  John A McGiven; Jason Sawyer; Lorraine L Perrett; Simon D Brew; Nicola J Commander; Alan Fisher; Stuart McLarnon; Kate Harper; Judy A Stack
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Simple and rapid field tests for brucellosis in livestock.

Authors:  Theresia Abdoel; Isabel Travassos Dias; Regina Cardoso; Henk L Smits
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Bovine tuberculosis in buffaloes, Southern Africa.

Authors:  Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky; Alexandre Caron; Calvin Gomo; Chris Foggin; Keith Dutlow; Davies Pfukenyi; Emily Lane; Sebastien Le Bel; Markus Hofmeyr; Tiny Hlokwe; Anita Michel
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  16 in total

1.  Documenting the absence of brucellosis in cattle, goats and dogs in a "One Health" interface in the Mnisi community, Limpopo, South Africa.

Authors:  Gregory Simpson; Tanguy Marcotty; Elodie Rouille; Nelson Matekwe; Jean-Jacques Letesson; Jacques Godfroid
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Spatial predictors of bovine tuberculosis infection and Brucella spp. exposure in pastoralist and agropastoralist livestock herds in the Ruaha ecosystem of Tanzania.

Authors:  Annette Roug; Deana Clifford; Joana Mazet; Rudovick Kazwala; Julius John; Peter Coppolillo; Woutrina Smith
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 3.  Brucellosis in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Matthew P Rubach; Jo E B Halliday; Sarah Cleaveland; John A Crump
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.915

4.  Cross-sectional survey of brucellosis and associated risk factors in the livestock-wildlife interface area of Nechisar National Park, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Hassen Chaka; Gezahegn Aboset; Abebe Garoma; Balako Gumi; Eric Thys
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Opposite outcomes of coinfection at individual and population scales.

Authors:  Erin E Gorsich; Rampal S Etienne; Jan Medlock; Brianna R Beechler; Johannie M Spaan; Robert S Spaan; Vanessa O Ezenwa; Anna E Jolles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Assessment of community awareness and risk perceptions of zoonotic causes of abortion in cattle at three selected livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zimbabwe.

Authors:  M Ndengu; M DE Garine-Wichatitsky; D M Pfukenyi; M Tivapasi; B Mukamuri; G Matope
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.434

7.  Buffalo, bush meat, and the zoonotic threat of brucellosis in Botswana.

Authors:  Kathleen Anne Alexander; Jason Kenna Blackburn; Mark Eric Vandewalle; Risa Pesapane; Eddie Kekgonne Baipoledi; Phil H Elzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Detection of Brucella abortus DNA in aborted goats and sheep in Egypt by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Gamal Wareth; Falk Melzer; Herbert Tomaso; Uwe Roesler; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-06-03

Review 9.  Retrospective and prospective perspectives on zoonotic brucellosis.

Authors:  Edgardo Moreno
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Relationship between burden of infection in ungulate populations and wildlife/livestock interfaces.

Authors:  A Caron; E Miguel; C Gomo; P Makaya; D M Pfukenyi; C Foggin; T Hove; M de Garine-Wichatitsky
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.