Literature DB >> 27207442

Latex agglutination using the periplasmic proteins antigen of Brucella melitensis is a successful, rapid, and specific serodiagnostic test for ovine brucellosis.

Alaa Bassuny Ismael1, Ayman Abdel-Aziz Swelum2, Salama A-H Mostafa3, Abdel-Rahman A Alhumiany4.   

Abstract

Brucellosis, especially caused by Brucella melitensis, is considered the most-widespread zoonosis in the world, particularly in developing countries. This study was planned to develop an accurate test for diagnosis of ovine brucellosis using a specific hot saline extracted soluble Brucella melitensis periplasmic proteins (SBPPs). The efficacy of the latex agglutination test (LAT) using SBPPs compared to the Rose Bengal test (RBT), buffered plate agglutination test (BPAT), serum agglutination test (SAT), and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (i-ELISA) was evaluated in the field diagnosis of ovine brucellosis. The test performance was evaluated by estimating sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), disease prevalence (DP), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) using test agreement and bacteriological culture in 1777 samples. The false-positive result was significantly (P ⩽0.05) lower in LAT than RBT, BPAT, SAT, and i-ELISA. With reference to test agreement, the Se, Sp, PPV, and PLR were highest (P ⩽0.05) in LAT 99.33%, 99.88%, 98.68%, and 827.25%, respectively. With reference to bacteriological culture, the LAT and i-ELISA tests showed a significant difference in Se with SAT. However, no significant difference in specificity was detected. The DP was 8.44% in the five tests. In conclusion, LAT using SBPPs of B. melitensis could be a suitable serodiagnostic field test for ovine brucellosis, with high sensitivity and specificity.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucella melitensis; latex agglutination test; ovine brucellosis; soluble Brucella melitensis periplasmic proteins (SBPPs)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27207442      PMCID: PMC5806760          DOI: 10.1177/0394632016648709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0394-6320            Impact factor:   3.219


  15 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests.

Authors:  M Greiner; I A Gardner
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 2.  Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology.

Authors:  Klaus Nielsen
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Rapid latex agglutination test for the serodiagnosis of human brucellosis.

Authors:  Theresia H Abdoel; Henk L Smits
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Rapid identification of rough Brucella isolates by a latex coagglutination assay with the 25-kilodalton outer membrane protein and rough-lipopolysaccharide-specific monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  R A Bowden; J M Verger; M Grayon; A Cloeckaert
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1997-09

5.  Field trial of six serological tests for bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  D A Abernethy; F D Menzies; S J McCullough; S W J McDowell; K E Burns; R Watt; A W Gordon; M Greiner; D U Pfeiffer
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.688

6.  Infection of cattle with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests.

Authors:  V Weynants; A Tibor; P A Denoel; C Saegerman; J Godfroid; P Thiange; J J Letesson
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Efficacy of different Rose Bengal and complement fixation antigens for the diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection in sheep and goats.

Authors:  J M Blasco; B Garin-Bastuji; C M Marin; G Gerbier; J Fanlo; M P Jiménez de Bagués; C Cau
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1994-04-16       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 8.  Laboratory-based diagnosis of brucellosis--a review of the literature. Part II: serological tests for brucellosis.

Authors:  Sascha Al Dahouk; Herbert Tomaso; Karsten Nöckler; Heinrich Neubauer; Dimitrios Frangoulidis
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.138

9.  Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  K Nielsen; P Smith; J Widdison; D Gall; L Kelly; W Kelly; P Nicoletti
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Salmonella enterica Serotype Urbana Interference with Brucellosis Serology.

Authors:  K Nielsen; P Smith; W L Yu; G Halbert
Journal:  J Immunoassay Immunochem       Date:  2007
View more
  1 in total

1.  Self-made Salmonella Pullorum agglutination antigen development and its potential practical application.

Authors:  B Yang; Q Niu; Y Yang; P Dai; T Yuan; S Xu; X Pan; Y Yang; G Zhu
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.