Literature DB >> 24515098

Validation of a simple universal IELISA for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.

S M Ayala1, D B Hasan, C A Celestino, G I Escobar, D M Zhao, N E Lucero.   

Abstract

The definitive diagnosis of brucellosis requires isolation of the agent, although negative isolation does not rule out the infection. In contrast, serological testing is more sensitive and, therefore, preferred in clinical practice. The majority of reported cases around the world were caused by Brucella melitensis, B. abortus, B. suis and B. canis. The first three species contain O-polysaccharide (OPS) on the cell surface, but B. canis contains no measurable OPS on the rough lipopolysaccharide (R-LPS). A universal indirect enzyme immunoassay for the detection of serum antibody to smooth and rough Brucella spp. in both normal (u-IELISA®) and rapid forms (R-u-IELISA®) has been developed, and, therefore, the potential use of this method was assessed in comparison to cELISA, conventional tests, IELISA and RSAT on a total of 478 sera. The 77 sera from blood donors with no clinical or epidemiological evidence of brucellosis and negative serological tests showed a specificity of 100 % for both u-IELISA® and R-u-IELISA®, with a cut-off value of %P 24 and %P 18, respectively. Sera from 49 culture-positive cases (16 B. suis, 15 B. abortus, 12 B. melitensis and 6 B. canis) yielded a sensitivity of 98 % for u-IELISA® and 95.9 % for R-u-IELISA®. In general, u-IELISA® showed good correlation with cELISA and IELISA for the detection of antibodies to smooth and rough Brucella strains, as well as for monitoring patients during treatment, but R-u-IELISA® seems to need additional optimisation. u-IELISA® is simple to perform and could be a suitable test for field laboratories and hospitals lacking skilled personnel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24515098     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2066-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  18 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology.

Authors:  Klaus Nielsen
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 2.  Update on laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis.

Authors:  George F Araj
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 3.  Brucellosis.

Authors:  Georgios Pappas; Nikolaos Akritidis; Mile Bosilkovski; Epameinondas Tsianos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Brucella inopinata sp. nov., isolated from a breast implant infection.

Authors:  Holger C Scholz; Karsten Nöckler; Cornelia Göllner; Peter Bahn; Gilles Vergnaud; Herbert Tomaso; Sascha Al Dahouk; Peter Kämpfer; Axel Cloeckaert; Marianne Maquart; Michel S Zygmunt; Adrian M Whatmore; Martin Pfeffer; Birgit Huber; Hans-Jürgen Busse; Barun Kumar De
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  A new variant of Brucella melitensis.

Authors:  N E Lucero; S M Ayala; G I Escobar; M Grayon; I Jacques
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 6.  Canine brucellosis: outbreaks and compliance.

Authors:  R Bruce Hollett
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 7.  Laboratory-based diagnosis of brucellosis--a review of the literature. Part II: serological tests for brucellosis.

Authors:  Sascha Al Dahouk; Herbert Tomaso; Karsten Nöckler; Heinrich Neubauer; Dimitrios Frangoulidis
Journal:  Clin Lab       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.138

8.  Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  K Nielsen; P Smith; J Widdison; D Gall; L Kelly; W Kelly; P Nicoletti
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Brucella isolated in humans and animals in Latin America from 1968 to 2006.

Authors:  N E Lucero; S M Ayala; G I Escobar; N R Jacob
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  Human brucellosis at a pig slaughterhouse.

Authors:  Gabriela I Escobar; Néstor R Jacob; Gustavo López; Sandra M Ayala; Adrian M Whatmore; Nidia E Lucero
Journal:  Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.268

View more
  3 in total

1.  Brucella canis is an intracellular pathogen that induces a lower proinflammatory response than smooth zoonotic counterparts.

Authors:  Carlos Chacón-Díaz; Pamela Altamirano-Silva; Gabriela González-Espinoza; María-Concepción Medina; Alejandro Alfaro-Alarcón; Laura Bouza-Mora; César Jiménez-Rojas; Melissa Wong; Elías Barquero-Calvo; Norman Rojas; Caterina Guzmán-Verri; Edgardo Moreno; Esteban Chaves-Olarte
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Comparison of Different Laboratory Methods for Clinical Detection of Brucella Infection.

Authors:  B Suo; J He; C Wu; D Wang
Journal:  Bull Exp Biol Med       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 0.804

3.  Human Brucellosis: Risks and Prevalence among Iranian Blood Donors Residing in Endemic Areas.

Authors:  Maryam Zadsar; Mohammad Reza Shirzadi; Mohammad Zeynali; Mahboubeh Rasouli; Gharib Karimi
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.747

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.