Literature DB >> 15129749

Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing.

Gretchen Kambe1.   

Abstract

Two eye movement experiments were conducted to investigate whether the morphological constituents of a prefixed word influenced early word processing when English was read. Participants read sentences containing free-stem, bound-stem, or pseudoprefixed words, and the availability of the prefixed word morphemes in the parafovea was manipulated. Although preview benefit was greatest for the entire word, there was evidence that subsequent word processing was facilitated in both the prefix-only and the stem-only conditions. This effect was not influenced by word type. There was no evidence that morphological preprocessing occurred when morphological information was available in the parafovea. In addition, reading times for the target word did not differ for the different word types. Thus, there was no evidence to suggest that morphological constituents influence early word processing during reading. It is possible that morphological effects tend to be obscured when examined within a sentence context (although this phenomenon may be specific to English).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129749     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  The effects of root frequency, word frequency, and length on the processing of prefixed English words during reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth Niswander-Klement; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-04

2.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J White; Simon P Liversedge; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese.

Authors:  Jinmian Yang; Nan Li; Suiping Wang; Timothy J Slattery; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-01-01

Review 4.  Parafoveal preview effects from word N + 1 and word N + 2 during reading: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Bernhard Angele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

5.  Semantic preview benefit in reading English: The effect of initial letter capitalization.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Elizabeth R Schotter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  TRANSPOSED LETTER EFFECTS IN PREFIXED WORDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR MORPHOLOGICAL DECOMPOSITION.

Authors:  Kathleen M Masserang; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-06-08

7.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04

8.  Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Elizabeth R Schotter; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

9.  Parafoveal processing of orthographic, morphological, and semantic information during reading Arabic: A boundary paradigm investigation.

Authors:  Ehab W Hermena; Eida J Juma; Maryam AlJassmi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.