Literature DB >> 15126403

Nucleotide variation in the tinman and bagpipe homeobox genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Evgeniy S Balakirev1, Francisco J Ayala.   

Abstract

The tinman (tin) and bagpipe (bap) genes are members of the NK homeobox gene family of Drosophila, so that tin occupies a higher position than bap in the regulatory hierarchy. Little is known about the level and pattern of genetic polymorphism in homeobox genes. We have analyzed nucleotide polymorphism in 27 strains of Drosophila melanogaster and one each of D. simulans and D. sechellia, within two closely linked regions encompassing a partial sequence of tin and the complete sequence of bap. The two genes exhibit different levels and patterns of nucleotide diversity. Two sets of sharply divergent sequence types are detected for tin. The haplotype structure of bap is more complex: about half of the sequences are identical (or virtually so), while the rest are fairly heterogeneous. The level of silent nucleotide variability is 0.0063 for tin but significantly higher, 0.0141, for bap, a level of polymorphism comparable to the most polymorphic structural genes of D. melanogaster. Recombination rate and gene conversion are also higher for bap than for tin. There is strong linkage disequilibrium, with the highest values in the introns of both genes and exon II of bap. The patterns of polymorphism in tin and bap are not compatible with an equilibrium model of selective neutrality. We suggest that negative selection and demographic history are the major factors shaping the pattern of nucleotide polymorphism in the tin and bap genes; moreover, there are clear indications of positive selection in the bap gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126403      PMCID: PMC1470812          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  47 in total

1.  Genetic polymorphism at two linked loci, Sod and Est-6, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Francisco J Ayala; Evgeniy S Balakirev; Alberto G Sáez
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2002-10-30       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  A statistical test for detecting geographic subdivision.

Authors:  R R Hudson; D D Boos; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Molecular analysis of duplicated esterase genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C Collet; K M Nielsen; R J Russell; M Karl; J G Oakeshott; R C Richmond
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Linkage disequilibrium in the white locus region of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  N T Miyashita; M Aguadé; C H Langley
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Chromosome interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Viability studies.

Authors:  R D Seager; F J Ayala
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  tinman and bagpipe: two homeo box genes that determine cell fates in the dorsal mesoderm of Drosophila.

Authors:  N Azpiazu; M Frasch
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  Why is the genome variable? Insights from Drosophila.

Authors:  C F Aquadro
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Estimates of linkage disequilibrium and the recombination parameter determined from segregating nucleotide sites in the alcohol dehydrogenase region of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  S W Schaeffer; E L Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  6 in total

1.  Estimating the contribution of mutation, recombination and gene conversion in the generation of haplotypic diversity.

Authors:  Peter L Morrell; Donna M Toleno; Karen E Lundy; Michael T Clegg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Molecular population genetics of the beta-esterase gene cluster of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Evgeniy S Balakirev; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Complex interplay of evolutionary forces in the ladybird homeobox genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Evgeniy S Balakirev; Maria Anisimova; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  High nucleotide divergence in developmental regulatory genes contrasts with the structural elements of olfactory pathways in caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Richard Jovelin; Joseph P Dunham; Frances S Sung; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  DNA polymorphism and selection at the bindin locus in three Strongylocentrotus sp. (Echinoidea).

Authors:  Evgeniy S Balakirev; Maria Anisimova; Vladimir A Pavlyuchkov; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 6.  Molecular Population Genetics.

Authors:  Sònia Casillas; Antonio Barbadilla
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.